Breaking the Price Puzzle: Where Does Blockchain's Lasting Value Come From?
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
Breaking the Price Puzzle: Where Does Blockchain's Lasting Value Come From?
If we measure success by speculation, we build castles in the sand. If we measure success by infrastructure, we lay the foundation.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insightsAuthor: Bryan Daugherty
Translation: Block unicorn
For over a decade, blockchain discourse has been constrained by a tired cliché: "Price matters."
Their argument is simple: developers won't build unless they can bet on the token's future price. They claim speculation is the "engine" of innovation.
This isn't just wrong—it's completely backwards.
History makes it clear: foundational technologies aren't built on speculative fantasies; they're forged in the crucible of utility. Price follows capability, not the other way around. Edison didn't sell "lightbulb coins" before perfecting the filament. Noyce didn't issue "chip tokens" to fund the integrated circuit. Cerf and Kahn didn't mint "ARPANET NFTs" to advance TCP/IP.
They built because the utility was undeniable, the problem urgent, and the need real. Only after these systems operated at scale in the real world did their financial benefits materialize.
The "price matters" camp in crypto inverts this model. They treat price as an incentive, hoping utility will follow. The results are obvious: hollow hype cycles, fleeting adoption, and fragile ecosystems.
Every leap in modern infrastructure tells the same story. The power grid wasn't born from bets on "watt tokens," but from the serious, long-term investment in physical infrastructure—driven by the need to deliver reliable, scalable electricity to cities and nations, not retail speculators.
The integrated circuit broke the "tyranny of digital" in electronics, driven by clear demands from NASA and the Department of Defense. Chip prices fell from $32 to $1.25—not due to speculation, but because the technology proved itself indispensable.
The internet? It was built to withstand nuclear attacks and connect research networks, not to fill anyone’s crypto wallet. Entirely funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), commercial use was even illegal for years. The protocols we rely on today emerged without a single speculative asset.
The lesson of every era is identical: capability first, financialization second.
In blockchain, lasting value doesn’t come from betting on volatile charts. It comes from delivering legitimate, scalable public infrastructure capable of handling billions of microtransactions daily and solving real-world problems.
If we measure success by speculation, we build sandcastles. If we measure success by infrastructure, we lay bedrock.
Why the "Price First" Model Fails
In every major technological revolution, the earliest and most committed supporters weren't speculators chasing quick doubles, but demanding users who tolerate no failure. In blockchain, this principle has been abandoned by those pushing a "token-first" strategy, and the cracks are evident.
Misaligned Incentives
When founders cash out early via token sales, motivation shifts from solving complex, systemic problems to riding hype cycles. This isn't just a cultural flaw—it's structural. Founders have legal obligations to equity holders, not token holders. The result? Value capture is optimized at the corporate level, while network participants creating real utility are left holding volatile assets.
Short-Termism
Price surges reward behaviors that spike today but damage sustainability tomorrow. Once these incentives vanish, participation and value collapse in protocols propped up by inflated token rewards.
Market Distortion
When token price becomes the core metric, engineering roadmaps favor what fuels speculation over what improves throughput, reduces transaction costs, or meets compliance requirements. The 2017 "blockchain craze" proved this: companies issued vague announcements, saw valuations soar with Bitcoin, then evaporate within 30 days due to lack of substance.
User Friction
Products with high token barriers force users to become speculators before they can be actual users. Instead of offering seamless, dedicated services, they throw potential users into pump-and-dump market volatility. This attracts gamblers, not the long-term participants needed to sustain an ecosystem. Once airdrop farmers and yield chasers leave, entire L1 ecosystems are hollowed out. Price may draw crowds, but it doesn't build foundations.
The Builder's Reality: Intrinsic Motivation + Direct Reward
Ask those who laid the internet backbone, designed database engines, or scaled blockchain infrastructure why they do it, and you'll never hear "because I can trade coins." They build to solve meaningful problems, earn peer respect, and push the boundaries of what's possible.
Open-source software proves this daily. Linux, Python, Apache, Kubernetes—these invisible arteries of the global economy carry trillions in value, and none were born from speculative token sales.
Decades of open-source history make one thing clear: world-changing infrastructure doesn't need tokens to survive. It needs a direct link between created value and captured value.
Projects that endure are funded because they solve critical problems, not because they're in a hype cycle. In this model, rewards come from measurable impact, enabling builders to focus on performance, reliability, and application—the very principles blockchain must follow to last.
The Path to a Legitimate, Scalable Future
If blockchain wants to move beyond its speculative adolescence, it must follow the same rigorous principles that built the internet, power grids, and modern computing. These systems didn't emerge by accident—they were deliberately, systematically built to solve large-scale problems.
It starts with a real, measurable problem—one with clear beneficiaries and definable outcomes. Not vague promises of "future potential," but urgent, concrete challenges solvable today.
Success must be measured by utility metrics: cost savings, reduced fraud, operational efficiency—not vanity metrics like "total value locked," which can inflate overnight from fluid capital and vanish just as fast. What matters are metrics that withstand market cycles and prove sustained value.
The path forward isn't unknown. We've seen it in every transformative infrastructure of the past century. The question isn't whether it's possible, but whether blockchain has the discipline and focus to achieve it.
Conclusion
Price speculation is fleeting. Utility compounds. If blockchain is to become a permanent, indispensable layer of the global economy, we must stop treating token price as the North Star.
Speculation will find its outlet—markets exist for that. As builders, investors, and policymakers, our responsibility is to ensure speculation rests on real, legitimate, and scalable foundations.
History won't judge us by the peaks of bull markets, but by the infrastructure we leave behind when the dust settles—infrastructure that withstands market cycles, serves billions, and delivers globally scalable, verifiable trust.
That is the future worth building. And it is the only future that lasts.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
@BWDaugherty
