What are the market implications following Babylon's mainnet launch?
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
What are the market implications following Babylon's mainnet launch?
Babylon has no "Achilles' heel," but the BTC Layer2 market cannot rely solely on Babylon.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insightsBy: Haotian
What are the market implications following @babylonlabs_io's mainnet launch? Undoubtedly, it will ignite a Staking wave across the Bitcoin ecosystem akin to what Eigenlayer brought to Ethereum, catalyzing the arrival of a BTCFi Summer.
So, how exactly does Babylon work? How does it differ from Eigenlayer? What are the potential highlights in the Babylon ecosystem? And where are Babylon’s weaknesses? Let me share my understanding:
Deep Dive into Babylon
In short: Babylon provides a secure, cross-chain-free, non-custodial native staking solution for PoS chains and Bitcoin Layer2s by constructing complex UTXO script contracts on the Bitcoin mainnet. But how?
Traditionally, turning assets from a PoW chain into yield-generating staked assets on a PoS chain requires third-party custody, followed by wrapping 1:1 tokens for circulation on a new PoS chain (e.g., WBTC). The recent trust crisis around WBTC exposed the core weakness of this model.
Babylon instead builds a remote staking system using Bitcoin’s chain, leveraging advanced cryptography and covenant scripts to lock BTC securely on the Bitcoin mainnet. It then uses a Cosmos SDK-based Babylon Chain to remotely manage and orchestrate these assets for downstream functionality:
1) Operations such as staking, unbonding, and withdrawal are governed by script-defined rules (e.g., EOTS signature scheme, finality-round multi-signature consensus), which are verified and enforced—via Control Plane operations—by validators on the Babylon Chain. This enables Babylon’s validator nodes to securely and decentralization-manage BTC assets locked remotely on the Bitcoin mainnet;
2) Babylon abstracts its validators’ verification and coordination capabilities into a "security-as-a-service" offering, delivering native-grade security consensus to other modular, compatible PoS chains.
As a result, other PoS chains generate yield that allows Babylon-staked BTC to earn returns. Theoretically, the greater the demand from PoS chains for this security service, the larger the earning potential for Babylon-staked BTC.
Babylon vs Eigenlayer
1) Babylon acts as a bridge connecting the Bitcoin mainnet with other PoS chains, aiming to match Bitcoin’s lack of yield on native PoW assets with PoS chains’ lack of decentralized BTC custody solutions. It enables BTC assets to natively integrate into other PoS chains and generate predictable yields. Thus, Babylon primarily serves BTC—the asset with unparalleled consensus strength—providing a technical framework and possibility for generating yield.
In contrast, Eigenlayer packages Ethereum validators’ verification power into a tradable commodity. On one hand, Ethereum L2s or other modular PoS chains can leverage Ethereum’s robust validator set; on the other, the yield generated by these PoS chains enhances returns for existing Ethereum stakers. Hence, Eigenlayer aims to commercialize Ethereum validators’ real-world verification capacity, amplifying native Ethereum staking yields.
2) From a business logic perspective, Babylon’s “security-as-a-service” and Eigenlayer’s “AVS-as-a-service” are nearly identical. However, the key difference lies in demand rigidity: PoS chains risk being criticized for centralization if they do not adopt Babylon for BTC custody.
In comparison, Eigenlayer leverages a yield-amplification mechanism for Ethereum staking, which may fuel short-term Restaking platform growth. Yet, tensions arise between real economic yields from providing security and the speculative race for LRT points. If actual commercial returns fail to keep pace with leveraged LRT incentives, the staking yield utility could backfire.
What to Watch in the Babylon Ecosystem?
Babylon’s launch will undoubtedly stimulate the long-dormant Bitcoin Layer2 market, with two major impacts:
1) It enables many projects previously relying on CeFi-style models to undergo a technical “upgrade,” eliminating centralized custody concerns and making yield-generation claims more credible to the market.
2) It injects direct commercial vitality into various BTC Layer2 PoS chains. BTC yield generation will accelerate TVL accumulation across these chains, intensifying the ongoing TVL points race. Beyond simple staking, we’ll also see diverse strategies emerge—such as LSD, LRT platforms combined with DeFi yield farming.
Anticipated token incentive wars among Babylon-integrated platforms will sustain momentum in the BTCFi sector, rivaling the Restaking frenzy sparked by Eigenlayer.
@SolvProtocol, positioned as a decentralized Bitcoin reserve hub, capitalized on the highly fragmented nature of BTC holdings, rapidly amassing nearly 20,000 BTC. Post-Babylon launch, SolvBTC.BBN is expected to see significant growth;
@Bedrock_DeFi, incubated within the BNB Chain ecosystem and backed by OKX Ventures, is a leading Babylon ecosystem project. Its recent UniBTC minting performance and strong expectations around Babylon points rewards have drawn notable attention;
@LorenzoProtocol introduces liquid staking, allowing users to stake and earn rewards without locking capital. Its Pendle-like principal-yield separation—combining liquidity principal tokens (LPT+) with yield-accruing tokens (YAT)—is particularly innovative;
Additionally, platforms including @BSquaredNetwork, @Lombard_Finance, @ChakraChain, and @BotanixLabs are poised to showcase their capabilities amid this Babylon-driven ecosystem surge.
Babylon’s “Weak Spots”?
Undeniably, Babylon brings overwhelmingly positive impact to the Bitcoin ecosystem—but it’s not without vulnerabilities.
Objectively speaking, the security consensus provided by Babylon relies on its Cosmos SDK-based chain rather than being fully controlled and orchestrated directly by script programs on the Bitcoin mainchain. This inherently limits it to the scope of “asset management.”
Therefore, while Babylon can spawn numerous “Blast-style yield-generating derivative projects,” it makes it difficult to grow tier-one, full-featured Layer2 “general-purpose chains” like Starknet or Arbitrum within the Bitcoin ecosystem.
The reasoning is straightforward: if a BTC Layer2 depends on Babylon for security consensus, it effectively forfeits its sovereignty, hindering complex future ecosystem development. As I’ve analyzed in detail in my pinned article, several deeper technical frameworks can address this limitation:
1) zkVM general-purpose protocol frameworks: @ProjectZKM leverages zk’s “trustworthiness” in cross-chain interoperability, building @GOATRollup with zk technology to enable ZK Bridgeless cross-chain transfers and an Entangled Rollup Network with inter-chain communication layers. This is akin to building a Cosmos IBC-style cross-chain module using zk tech to empower the BTC ecosystem—a more universal, native BTC底层 technical solution suitable for most sovereign BTC Layer2 chains;
2) UTXO Stack architecture: developed by @NervosNetwork CKB team based on RGB++, this BTC Layer2 solution uses isomorphic binding to allow BTC and its derivatives to leap onto the CKB chain for circulation—effectively reconstructing a BTC execution VM environment to support programmable complexity;
Other promising frameworks include @RoochNetwork’s MoveVM global-state execution architecture and @atomicalsxyz’s AVM virtual machine, all of which represent next-generation forces driving BTC Layer2 innovation.
If Babylon can lead the first wave of BTCFi yield adoption, and a wave of technically solid, innovative projects follows with the second, that’s the true flourishing era I envision for BTC Layer2.
In conclusion, Babylon may not have fatal flaws, but the BTC Layer2 market must not rely solely on Babylon. Believe firmly: a summer for the Bitcoin ecosystem is coming.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
Haotian | CryptoInsight
