Technical Analysis of API3: Another Dark Horse in the Oracle Track?
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
Technical Analysis of API3: Another Dark Horse in the Oracle Track?
API3 targets a more decentralized and flexible long-tail oracle market.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insightsAuthor: Haotian
When it comes to the oracle sector, most people instinctively look to @chainlink as the leader. However, with the rise of high-performance blockchains and a wave of new lightweight modular projects, competition in the oracle space is intensifying.
Recently, there's been talk in the market about @API3DAO "killing" Chainlink. But what exactly does API3 do? Could the OEV Network really reshape the MEV oracle landscape? Below, I'll share my perspective through a mix of educational insight and business competition analysis.
Understanding API3’s First-party Oracle
Typically, oracle services like Chainlink consist of several components: data sources (e.g., exchanges), data-fetching nodes (API providers), an oracle network for processing, and end users (smart contract projects).
This setup functions as a bridge from off-chain data sources to on-chain applications. Oracle nodes concurrently pull data from multiple channels, while the oracle network coordinates, validates, and aggregates this data to minimize errors before delivering price feeds to smart contracts.
There are two key aspects to this current oracle workflow:
1) The more API data-fetching nodes involved, the richer, more accurate, and decentralized the data becomes—but these nodes essentially perform mechanical “mining” work with limited agency;
2) As more smart contract projects integrate with the oracle network, pricing mechanisms can become increasingly centralized, increasing manipulation risks and eroding user trust.
At its core, traditional oracles act as third-party intermediaries. This limits the role and potential of API service providers, while the centralization of the oracle platform itself invites criticism—essentially creating an irreconcilable tension.
@API3DAO’s first-party oracle model removes the intermediate preprocessing layer provided by oracle platforms, enabling direct connections between data providers and project teams.
For API nodes, this represents an upgrade in autonomy—they’re no longer just passive data fetchers but active operators capable of advanced development and customization, enhancing their service capabilities and supporting specialized data needs;
For end-user projects, this means lower-cost, more flexible collaboration with API nodes, allowing tailored data integration that supports innovative dApp development.
API3 Targets the Fragmented, Flexible Long-tail Oracle Market
Clearly, API3 is targeting a more fragmented and flexible long-tail segment of the oracle market. By empowering API providers with enhanced operational capabilities, API3 aims to build bridges between data suppliers and consumers using a more web3-native approach—lightweight and modular. How?
API3 consists of two core components:
1) Airnode provides API providers with the foundational infrastructure to deploy oracle nodes and connect directly with projects. With simplified configuration and management, even non-blockchain-native API providers can easily become oracle node operators at low cost;
2) dAPI functions as a decentralized DAO. API nodes continuously collect and update data via digital signatures, while smart contracts can securely and transparently access this data on a pay-per-use basis. The entire dAPI system is governed by a decentralized DAO using staking and slashing mechanisms for transparent security and governance.
In essence, API3 seeks to create a disintermediated oracle market using lightweight infrastructure and DAO-based incentive mechanisms. In contrast, Chainlink already has a loyal customer base, stable pricing mechanisms, and an entrenched position that cannot be easily displaced.
API3’s strategic thinking mirrors Celestia’s challenge in the data availability (DA) wars—gradually capturing Ethereum’s Layer 2 market. After all, Chainlink can’t serve every smart contract use case. There will always be demand for lightweight, cost-effective solutions. Some users require faster, customized data feeds, and some API providers want broader business opportunities.
Rather than framing API3 as a "Chainlink killer," it's more accurate to see it as a strong complement—one that helps expand and diversify the overall market.
Whether end users prefer Chainlink’s proven stability or API3’s cost efficiency and flexibility is ultimately up to market forces. In my view, API3 poses little short-term threat to Chainlink, but in the long run—especially as blockchain applications grow more modular—its prospects are compelling.
Is OEV Network a Higher-dimensional Reinvention of MEV?
Recently, API3 launched OEV Network—a Layer 2 chain built on Polygon CDK. What’s the use case here? Multiple API nodes have permission to update data. In DeFi scenarios, when a smart contract triggers a liquidation price point, liquidators can buy out a user’s collateral and profit once prices stabilize.
Under normal circumstances, these liquidators are often the API node operators themselves, since they control price updates. Before OEV Network’s governance framework existed, this process was chaotic—API nodes raced to update data first to claim liquidation rights. This competition could amplify market volatility, turning objective data providers into self-interested arbitrageurs. Clearly, this distorts the original purpose.
But this behavior couldn’t be effectively prevented. Connecting API nodes directly to smart contracts reduces platform interference and promotes market-driven operations. Yet without proper governance, competitive arbitrage leads to disorder—with no third party able to intervene effectively.
OEV Network serves as a governance layer: when a dApp user’s position nears liquidation, participants can bid in an auction on the dAPI3 network. The highest bidder gains the right to submit the next oracle data update—and capture the associated MEV profit.
Why call this a “higher-dimensional reinvention” of MEV? In the original MEV 1.0 paradigm, value extraction emerged naturally from market dynamics. When API nodes and smart contracts interacted during price fluctuations, the first node to detect a liquidation opportunity would rush to claim it.
This led to the emergence of MEV-Boost-like systems dedicated solely to capturing such profits, incentivizing some API nodes to prioritize arbitrage over serving end users—undermining the open-market ethos of dAPIs. So what’s the solution?
MEV 2.0 embraces transparency. Since MEV opportunities exist regardless, why not make them visible and fair? Instead of hidden races, API nodes now openly bid for liquidation rights. Crucially, the revenue from these auctions is redistributed back to dApp users via the OEV Network—returning value that was previously extracted from them.
This redefines the commercial logic of MEV. Previously, MEV enriched only a select few arbitrageurs. Now, it becomes a mechanism that broadly benefits end users.
Above.
API3 isn’t alone in attempting this higher-dimensional reframing of MEV. Flashbots 2.0, currently in development, is also exploring a similar narrative. Given that MEV undermines fairness for on-chain users, transforming a system that benefits a few into one that empowers the many could indeed open up transformative new possibilities.
Note: Strategic positioning in the oracle sector is critically important. #Link #Pyth #API3 #Band —while Chainlink dominates much of the market, competition remains fierce, and new contenders will inevitably emerge. This space deserves sustained attention.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
Haotian | CryptoInsight
