VanEck proposes launching a "Treasury + BTC" bond to address the $14 trillion challenge
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
VanEck proposes launching a "Treasury + BTC" bond to address the $14 trillion challenge
This concept was introduced at the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Summit, aiming to address sovereign financing needs and investors' demand for inflation protection.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insightsSource: cryptoslate
Translation: Blockchain Knight
Matthew Sigel, Head of Digital Asset Research at VanEck, has proposed the creation of "BitBonds"—a hybrid debt instrument combining exposure to U.S. Treasuries with BTC—as a novel strategy to address the U.S. government’s looming $14 trillion refinancing need.
The concept, introduced at the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Summit, aims to meet both sovereign financing demands and investor demand for inflation protection.
BitBonds would be structured as 10-year securities, with 90% traditional U.S. Treasury exposure and 10% allocated to BTC, funded from the bond proceeds.
At maturity, investors would receive the full face value of the Treasury portion (e.g., $90 for a $100 bond) plus the market value of the BTC allocation.
In addition, investors would capture all BTC appreciation gains until the yield-to-maturity reaches 4.5%. Any returns beyond that threshold would be shared between the government and bondholders.
This structure aims to align investor incentives with the U.S. Treasury’s need to refinance at competitive rates, as investors increasingly seek protection against dollar depreciation and asset inflation.
Sigel described the proposal as a “unified solution to misaligned incentives.”
Investor Break-Even Points
According to Sigel’s projections, the investor break-even point depends on the bond’s fixed coupon rate and BTC’s compound annual growth rate (CAGR).
For a bond with a 4% coupon, the break-even BTC CAGR is 0%. However, lower-coupon bonds have higher thresholds: a 2% coupon bond breaks even at a 13.1% CAGR, while a 1% coupon requires a 16.6% CAGR.
If BTC maintains a CAGR between 30% and 50%, projected returns rise sharply across all coupon levels, with investor gains reaching up to 282%.
Sigel noted that BitBonds would serve as a “convex bet” for BTC believers, offering asymmetric upside potential while preserving a base layer of risk-free return. However, the structure means investors bear full downside risk from the BTC exposure.
In cases of BTC depreciation, low-coupon bonds could suffer significant negative returns. For example, if BTC underperforms, a 1% coupon BitBond could lose between 20% and 46%.
U.S. Treasury Benefits
From the U.S. government’s perspective, the primary benefit of BitBonds would be reduced financing costs. Even if BTC appreciates slightly or remains flat, the Treasury would save on interest compared to issuing traditional 4% fixed-rate bonds.
According to Sigel’s analysis, the government’s break-even interest rate is approximately 2.6%. Issuing bonds with coupons below this level would reduce annual debt service costs, generating savings even if BTC performs poorly or flatlines.
Sigel estimates that issuing $100 billion in BitBonds with a 1% coupon and no BTC appreciation would save the government $13 billion over the bond’s life. If BTC achieves a 30% CAGR, the same issuance could generate over $40 billion in additional value, primarily through shared BTC gains.
Sigel also pointed out that this approach would create a differentiated sovereign bond class, giving the U.S. asymmetric upside exposure to BTC while reducing its dollar-denominated debt burden.
He added: “BTC upside only makes the deal better. The worst case is low-cost financing; the best case is long-term volatility exposure to the hardest asset in the world.”
The government’s BTC CAGR break-even rises with higher coupon rates—14.3% for a 3% coupon bond and 16.3% for a 4% coupon version. The Treasury would only incur losses if it issued high-coupon bonds and BTC significantly underperformed.
Trade-offs in Complexity and Risk Allocation
Despite potential benefits, VanEck’s report acknowledges structural drawbacks. Investors bear full BTC downside risk but have limited participation in upside gains, making low-coupon bonds less attractive unless BTC performs exceptionally well.
Structurally, the Treasury would also need to issue more debt to offset the 10% of proceeds used to buy BTC. For every $100 billion raised, an additional 11.1% in bonds would need to be issued to compensate for the BTC allocation.
The proposal suggests possible design improvements, including offering investors partial downside protection against sharp BTC declines.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
@CryptoSlate
