What Makes for a Benign Currency: Why Decentralized Systems Struggle to Achieve True Stability?
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
What Makes for a Benign Currency: Why Decentralized Systems Struggle to Achieve True Stability?
The future of money belongs to systems that are designed with a comprehensive understanding of how money actually works.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insightsAuthor: Zeus
Translation: Block unicorn
Introduction
Currency is the foundation of economic activity, yet we rarely examine what qualities make money effective. As digital currencies challenge traditional notions of money, we must re-evaluate the traits that enable a currency to fulfill its core functions in a modern economy.
History shows that the definition of money lies not merely in its technical features, but in its ability to evolve through distinct developmental stages. True money must undergo an arduous evolutionary journey—one that most emerging currencies fail to complete.
The Full Monetary Lifecycle
To become a fully functional currency, an asset must successfully pass through four developmental stages:
1. Attracting Value
First, a currency must attract capital and attention. Whether through precious metals, government backing, or potential appreciation, all successful currencies begin by incentivizing people to hold them. This initial attraction lays the foundation for further development.
Without this stage, a currency cannot gather the critical mass necessary for widespread adoption. Many digital currencies excel here, leveraging speculation and network effects to build initial adoption and liquidity.
2. Scaling Up
Second, the currency must achieve sufficient scale and liquidity to support meaningful economic activity. It needs enough market depth to prevent transactions from causing excessive volatility, and sufficient distribution to ensure counterparties are readily available.
Scale brings credibility, network effects, and the liquidity required for broader applications. Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have successfully passed this stage, reaching market capitalizations in the trillions of dollars.
3. Stability Mechanisms
Third, the currency must develop mechanisms that make it reliable for commerce and contracts. Stability does not mean fixed value, but rather predictability and resilience under market stress. This requires both technical design and institutional support.
Many emerging currencies fail at this stage. Real stability demands systems that function reliably under diverse market conditions—without collapsing or requiring external intervention. The currency must possess intrinsic mechanisms to handle both excess demand and insufficient demand.
4. Economic Utility
Finally, the currency must be genuinely useful in everyday economic activities beyond speculation. It must serve reliably as a unit of account, medium of exchange, and store of value across various economic contexts.
True utility means supporting the full range of financial functions needed by a modern economy: efficient payments, reliable contracts, viable lending markets, and stable planning horizons. It means the currency becomes mundane and practical—not just exciting and novel.
The Coordination Problem
Few recognize that later stages involve solving fundamental coordination challenges that grow exponentially more difficult as the system scales.
Consider essential monetary functions such as lender-of-last-resort capabilities, emergency stabilization measures, or crisis interventions. These are public goods by nature. They require actors to prioritize systemic stability over immediate self-interest—to take personal risks for collective benefit.
In purely self-interested, decentralized systems, these critical functions lack structural support. Such systems may operate well under normal conditions, but collapse when stability matters most.
We've repeatedly witnessed this fragility in cryptocurrency markets:
During the March 2020 crash, exchanges like BitMEX had to halt trading to prevent cascading liquidations from threatening the entire ecosystem with total collapse.
On "Black Thursday," MakerDAO required emergency governance responses and community bailouts due to under-collateralization.
LUNA initially survived market stress through massive intervention by well-funded players, but collapsed completely when it grew too large for even these supporters to stabilize.
These examples reveal a profound truth: despite their theoretical emphasis on trustless systems, cryptocurrencies repeatedly depend on implicitly trusted actors making discretionary interventions to survive crises.
As systems grow larger, this coordination problem becomes exponentially harder. Issues manageable through informal coordination at small scale become impossible once the system exceeds certain thresholds.
Capital Formation Requirements
Beyond stability, sound money must support capital formation—the lending processes that drive economic productivity. This is another fundamental limitation facing existing cryptocurrencies.
While crypto assets are increasingly used as collateral, they are rarely used as units of account for debt. Few are willing to borrow in Bitcoin (BTC) or Ethereum (ETH), as their volatility introduces unmanageable risk for both borrowers and lenders.
A fully functional currency must provide a stable unit of account for intertemporal agreements. Whether borrowing to build homes, finance businesses, or develop infrastructure, participants need reasonable certainty about the future value of their debts.
Designing Complete Monetary Systems
The limitations of existing cryptocurrencies are not temporary issues, but fundamental design constraints. Assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum were primarily designed for the first two stages—value attraction and scaling.
Their fixed or highly constrained supply models create strong incentives for early adoption and speculation. This design excels at launching value and achieving initial scale, but becomes a liability when stability and utility are needed for broader adoption.
Without mechanisms to adapt to changing economic conditions, provide last-resort functions, or stabilize during crises, these systems remain fundamentally incomplete as monetary systems. They work well as ledgers of ownership, but struggle to become fully functional money.
The Complete Architecture of Sound Money
Based on these observations, we can define what a fully architected monetary system requires:
Adaptive supply mechanism: Sound money must be able to expand when demand exceeds supply and contract when supply exceeds demand, creating natural stabilizing pressure.
Lender-of-last-resort functionality: Sound money needs built-in mechanisms to provide liquidity, stability, and intervention during market stress without relying on external coordination.
-
Productive reserve utilization: Sound money should deploy its accumulated value into productive uses rather than leaving it idle or burning it, generating sustainable value for the system.
-
Foundation for lending markets: Sound money must offer the stability required for functional lending markets to develop, enabling capital formation without excessive risk.
-
Transparent health metrics: Sound money should provide clear indicators of systemic health, enabling participants to make informed decisions based on fundamentals rather than mere market sentiment.
The historical development of traditional monetary systems was not accidental—these features evolved because they are essential for money to function across diverse economic conditions.
Bridging the Gap
This analysis does not diminish the achievements of cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin and others have accomplished something extraordinary: proving that non-sovereign monetary systems can be launched through market incentives by successfully completing the first two stages.
Their success provides crucial strategic insight into the initial phase of monetary evolution. The key insight is that complete monetary systems must be designed with their ultimate mature state in mind, while still being able to navigate early evolutionary phases.
Monetary technology needs mechanisms for initial growth and speculation, while also providing a pathway to stability and utility once sufficient scale is reached. They must combine the launch capabilities that made cryptocurrencies successful with the adaptive mechanisms currently missing.
Conclusion: The Path to Sound Money
Monetary evolution is not merely a technical challenge, but a solution to coordination problems that intensify with scale. Sound money must be designed to function throughout its entire lifecycle—from initial adoption to mature application—with built-in mechanisms to adapt to changing conditions without constant external intervention.
This does not imply a return to fully centralized systems, but rather the design of architecturally complete systems with the mechanisms necessary for monetary operation built in. It means creating currencies that work not only under ideal conditions, but across a wide range of economic scenarios.
As we continue developing digital currencies, these insights provide a framework for assessing their potential. We should not focus solely on technical features or short-term price appreciation, but ask whether a currency possesses the architectural completeness required to perform as high-quality money throughout its entire evolution.
The future of money does not belong to systems with the most advanced technology or the strongest initial growth, but to those designed with a deep understanding of how money actually functions in practice.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
@ohmzeus
