The Battle Between Tokenized Deposits and Stablecoins: The Future of Finance Is Not Replacement, But Integration
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
The Battle Between Tokenized Deposits and Stablecoins: The Future of Finance Is Not Replacement, But Integration
The future of finance belongs on-chain, and tokenized deposits and stablecoins are both essential infrastructure to achieve this goal.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insightsAuthor: Simon Taylor
Translation: Block unicorn
Banks create money. Stablecoins move it. We need both.
Proponents of tokenized deposits say: "Stablecoins are unregulated shadow banks. Once banks tokenize deposits, everyone will prefer banks."
Some banks and central banks love this narrative.
Stablecoin advocates say: "Banks are dinosaurs. We don’t need them on-chain at all. Stablecoins are the future of money."
Crypto natives especially love this story.
Both sides are missing the point.
Banks offer cheaper credit to their largest customers
Your $100 deposit becomes a $90 loan (or more). That’s how fractional reserve banking works. For centuries, it has powered economic growth.
-
A Fortune 500 company parks $500 million at JPMorgan Chase.
-
In return, they get massive credit lines at below-market rates.
-
Deposits are the bank’s business model—and big companies know it.
Tokenized deposits bring this mechanism on-chain, but only serve the bank’s own clients. You’re still within the bank’s regulatory perimeter, subject to its hours, processes, and compliance rules.
For companies needing low-cost credit lines, tokenized deposits are a solid choice.
Stablecoins are like cash
Circle and Tether hold 100% reserves—around $200 billion in bonds. They earn 4–5% yield but pay you nothing.
In return, your funds operate outside any bank regulation. By 2025, an estimated $9 trillion in cross-border transfers will flow through stablecoins. Accessible anytime, anywhere with internet—permissionless, 24/7.
No intermediary banks asking questions, no waiting for SWIFT settlement, no “we’ll get back to you in 3–5 business days.”
For a company needing to pay an Argentine supplier at 11 p.m. on a Saturday, stablecoins are ideal.
The future is both
A company wanting favorable credit terms from a bank may also want to use stablecoins to access long-tail markets.
Imagine this:
-
A Fortune 500 company holds tokenized deposits at JPMorgan Chase
-
In return, it gets preferential credit lines for its U.S. operations
-
It needs to pay an Argentine supplier that prefers stablecoins
-
So it swaps JPMD for USDC
This is where we’re headed.
On-chain. Atomic.
Best of both worlds.
Use traditional rails where they work.
Use stablecoins where they don’t.
It’s not either/or—it’s both.
-
Tokenized deposits → Low-cost credit within the banking system
-
Stablecoins → Cash-like settlement outside the banking system
-
On-chain exchange → Instant conversion, zero settlement risk
Each has trade-offs.
They will coexist.
On-chain payments > APIs for payment orchestration
Some large banks might say, "We don’t need tokenized deposits—we have APIs." In some cases, they’re right.
And that’s precisely where on-chain finance shines.
Smart contracts can build logic across multiple businesses and individuals. When a supplier’s deposit arrives, a smart contract can automatically trigger inventory financing, working capital loans, or FX hedging. These actions happen instantly and automatically—whether by banks or non-banks.
Deposit → Stablecoin → Pay invoice → Downstream payments completed.
APIs are point-to-point. Smart contracts are many-to-many. This makes them ideal for workflows across organizational boundaries. This is the power of on-chain finance.
It’s a fundamentally different architecture for financial services.
The future is on-chain
Tokenized deposits solve low-cost credit. Deposits are locked. Banks lend against them. Their business model stays intact.
Stablecoins solve portability. Funds move anywhere, permissionlessly. The Global South gains access to dollars. Businesses gain fast settlement.
Advocates of tokenized deposits want only regulated payment rails.
Advocates of stablecoins want to replace banks.
The future needs both.
Fortune 500 companies want massive credit lines from banks and instant global settlement. Emerging markets want local credit creation and dollar access. DeFi wants composability and real-world asset backing.
Debating who will win misses what’s actually happening. The future of finance is on-chain. Tokenized deposits and stablecoins are both essential infrastructure to get there.
Stop arguing about who wins. Start building interoperability.
Composable money.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
@FT
