
SUSS NiFT: The Importance of the Political Economy of Cryptocurrencies — A Focus on Singapore
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected

SUSS NiFT: The Importance of the Political Economy of Cryptocurrencies — A Focus on Singapore
Singapore is an open economy that has consistently been friendly toward Web3, with relatively stable and sustainable policies.
Author:
Li Guoquan: Professor at SUSS, Chairman of Global FinTech Institute, Co-Founder of SUSS NiFT Blockchain Security Alliance
Zheng Jincheng: Researcher at SUSS, Chartered Fintech Professional
Bitcoin’s emergence in 2009 was timely. In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, widespread skepticism toward traditional banking systems arose. The crisis exposed the fragility of fractional reserve banking, where banks hold only a small portion of depositors’ funds as reserves and lend out the rest. If many depositors simultaneously demand withdrawals, liquidity crises may ensue.
Bitcoin offered an alternative to this untrusted banking paradigm by recording peer-to-peer transactions transparently on a public blockchain. With its fixed supply of 21 million and independence from central banks, Bitcoin provided a timely solution and gained attention as a more secure and autonomous financial option.
Undoubtedly, today governments and regulators also recognize Bitcoin’s functions and respect the technology and community behind it.
However, the demographic landscape within the cryptocurrency space has evolved. Early adopters were drawn to the political and economic implications of decentralized money. Today, many new entrants are primarily attracted to the technological and financial efficiency of cryptocurrencies. Key opinion leaders (KOLs) in the industry, once advocates for decentralization and autonomy, now often champion financial efficiency and even support regulation if it leads to mainstream adoption and scalability.
The path toward mass crypto adoption is fraught with challenges. As the industry grows, so does the cost of compliance with regulatory standards. This raises a pertinent question: given rising costs, is broad adoption feasible? Moreover, there has been a noticeable shift in attitudes—many now dismiss privacy-focused innovations outright.
Thanks to pioneering efforts from projects like Zcash, zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) have gained significant traction. These initiatives played a crucial role in educating regulators about the technology. A notable example is Zooko Wilcox’s zero-knowledge proof course at the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS) in July 2016. This led to Project Ubin 2, which emphasized privacy protection in central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). CBDCs are electronic versions of a nation’s currency issued and managed by its central bank. Their value would be far more stable than stablecoins, backed by national creditworthiness.
The value of the crypto industry is intrinsically tied to its technology—especially aspects that are difficult for regulators to control. If cryptocurrencies become easily regulated, their intrinsic value may diminish, precisely because their appeal lies in decentralization and autonomy.
Unregulatable crypto technologies are key determinants of the industry's value and contribution to the virtual economy. Accepting regulation is a double-edged sword. The easier it becomes to regulate, the more vulnerable the virtual economy is to control by malicious actors. This could be disastrous for lenient governments, especially those promoting CBDCs and stablecoins.
The crypto community must remain vigilant against illegal activities such as money laundering, human trafficking, drug trade, terrorist financing, gambling, and pornography. Yet maintaining balance is essential. Privacy-enhancing technologies like Tornado Cash should be evaluated for their potential benefits, not solely for possible harms. Rejecting such technologies outright could hinder Web3 growth and long-term value propositions.
As we move toward a digital economy, the importance of data security and privacy cannot be overstated. These are not merely technical requirements but foundational elements for preserving human dignity. Tools and technologies underpinning the digital economy should prioritize these values.
In advancing the digital economy, data security and privacy must never be compromised. Underlying technologies are critical to upholding human dignity. Let us hope we do not advance the digital economy at the expense of human dignity.
The geopolitics of cryptocurrency is multifaceted, with nations adopting different approaches based on their economic, political, and strategic interests. As the crypto landscape evolves, it will undoubtedly play a significant role in shaping global power dynamics, trade relations, and financial systems. Builders must consider not only technology but also politics and economics. For instance, while technology may be virtual, developers who do not vanish like Satoshi Nakamoto face physical constraints. They must avoid expanding into regions hostile to crypto, reduce costs during bear markets, and ensure operations are based in politically stable jurisdictions. Otherwise, projects may be suspended due to unforeseen issues.
Major powers may not be friendly toward cryptocurrencies or stablecoins—but this is precisely what smaller nations need. Crypto-stablecoins can thrive by meeting the needs of de-dollarized small countries. Understanding the geopolitics of cryptocurrency can help us succeed in the right direction.
While major powers may resist cryptocurrencies, smaller, de-dollarized nations benefit greatly. Grasping these geopolitical nuances can effectively guide crypto ventures.
Regulatory arbitrage—exploiting differences in regulations across jurisdictions—is a short-term strategy in the crypto space. As cryptocurrencies gain popularity, global institutions are pushing for standardized regulations, narrowing the scope for such arbitrage. International bodies like the G20 and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are working to create harmonized regulatory frameworks. Cryptocurrency regulations are fluid; a country friendly to crypto today may impose stricter rules tomorrow. Operating in lax regulatory environments may damage corporate reputation. Additionally, constantly relocating to exploit regulatory gaps poses logistical challenges and may disrupt business operations. For sustainable growth, operating in clear regulatory environments and collaborating with regulators is advisable. Complying with stringent regulations can also build user trust, which is vital for the long-term success of the crypto industry.
Singapore, an open economy, has consistently maintained a Web3-friendly stance, with relatively stable and sustainable policies. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), as the nation’s central bank, is committed to promoting sustainable economic growth and nurturing a stable financial hub. MAS’s key performance indicators include fostering sustainable economic growth and employment, maintaining a strong, resilient, and trusted financial center, and cultivating innovation and diversity in finance.
Unlike Hong Kong, which focuses on retail investor development, Singapore emphasizes institutional-level business activities. MAS welcomes responsible innovation initiatives in digital assets and encourages interested parties to submit proposals to its FinTech Regulatory Sandbox for real-world testing. This enables Web3 startups and projects to test their solutions in practical scenarios without immediately facing full regulatory compliance. Beyond regulation, MAS places strong emphasis on development. It excels at balancing oversight with growth, applying appropriate levels of regulation across different product development stages.
Through programs like Financial Sector Technology and Innovation (FSTI 3.0), MAS will provide up to S$150 million over three years to fund technology and innovation. Singapore is offering financial support to projects capable of shaping Web3’s future.
Singapore’s emphasis on education has cultivated a highly skilled talent pool, making it a hotspot for Web3 talent. SUSS, National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Management University, Global FinTech Institute, and other universities and institutions in Singapore offer specialized Web3 courses.
Finally, Singapore’s global connectivity and status as a financial hub further enhance its appeal. Its strategic location makes it an ideal base for Web3 companies to connect with global partners, investors, and markets. For these reasons, Token 2049 has chosen Singapore for the past two years.
Nevertheless, Singapore’s welcoming attitude toward crypto assets should not be mistaken for laxity. Crypto service providers in Singapore are prohibited from marketing their services to the general public and can only conduct activities on their social media platforms. Still, Singapore remains competitive in international markets.
The intersection of ethics and legality is complex, particularly in fields like cryptocurrency and technology. Indeed, ethical design does not always align with legal requirements, and strict adherence to law may not always be ethically sound. This dilemma is not unique to crypto—it reflects broader challenges in tech domains like artificial intelligence.
Collaboration with regulators and governments is crucial for the crypto community. Equal partnership helps create balanced and fair regulatory frameworks rather than mere compliance-driven oversight. This approach can prevent over-regulation from stifling innovation while addressing ethical concerns.
The crypto industry should avoid a “profit-at-all-costs” mindset, as it may lead to ethical dilemmas and regulatory backlash. Striking a balance among innovation, compliance, and ethics is essential. It is important to refer to established ethical and behavioral guidelines and engage in ongoing dialogue with regulators and experts to navigate these complexities.
In conclusion, the crypto community should prioritize ethical principles and legal compliance. Collaboration with regulators, combined with a commitment to ethical innovation, will be key to achieving mass adoption and ensuring the industry’s long-term sustainability.
Singapore’s robust regulatory framework makes it a prime destination for crypto innovators. We invite you to come to Singapore to collaborate, innovate, and contribute to global blockchain development. Let us leverage Singapore’s strengths to drive innovation and create lasting impact!
About SUSS NiFT
The Singapore University of Social Sciences’ Node for Inclusive FinTech (SUSS NiFT) serves as the university’s “center of excellence” driving all fintech initiatives, dedicated to delivering high-quality research, public education, and inclusive policy advocacy in financial technology for societal benefit.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News














