Crypto VC Landscape: Who’s Delivering Brand Empowerment, and Who’s Providing Value Addition?
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
Crypto VC Landscape: Who’s Delivering Brand Empowerment, and Who’s Providing Value Addition?
Cryptocurrency venture capital often appears opaque to outsiders, and many regard it as one of the most competitive and cutthroat segments within the crypto space.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insights
Written by: Dylan Olivia Hunzeker
Translated by: TechFlow
Crypto venture capital often appears opaque from the outside, and many view it as one of the most competitive and cutthroat segments within the crypto space. The constant emergence of new funds, lightning-fast funding rounds, and recent Twitter threads (written by disgruntled founders) criticizing so-called "vulture capital" — funds that chase deals without offering real resources — have led some founders today to avoid raising from pure deal-making funds, instead opting to partner with broader networks of angel investors or DAOs.
Whenever I reflect on who has achieved traditional success in crypto primitives, I'm reminded of a particularly intense scene from the film *Margin Call* (often translated as "The Big Short," an underrated gem). In this scene, Jeremy Irons plays a powerful CEO who understands only the most essential things — and nothing else. As the market is about to collapse, he turns to his colleagues and asks: “Why do I make so much money?”
“If I told you there were three ways to make a living in this business,” he says rhetorically, “what would they be?”
“First, be smarter. Second, cheat.”
This heuristic (slightly modified) can apply to most crypto funds you’ve heard of. However, a new framework has recently emerged that helps us understand these funds by dividing them into three broad categories. As Richard Malone, COO of Advanced Blockchain AG, eloquently put it, current funds fall into three fundamental types: Brand Funds, Specific Value-Add Funds, and All-Purpose Service/Value-Add Funds (which typically begin and operate as incubators or accelerators). I’ll build on this classification with additional nuances and subcategories to further clarify how these funds are structured.
A Quick Overview of Crypto Venture Capital
You can think of the earliest-launching funds as Brand Funds. They come with rosters full of high-profile names and marquee investor LPs; they possess enduring limited partner bases; they’re widely recognized across the industry. Raising from such funds is akin to attending an Ivy League university, owning a rare Hermès Birkin bag, or driving a Bugatti. These Brand Funds become self-fulfilling prophecies — when other funds hear they're participating in a round, they rush to join, triggering unprecedented FOMO, attracting more resources, and creating strong network effects. (This isn’t new — traditional VC operates similarly.)
Stereotypically speaking, brand matters because it often reflects reality — but brand is not everything. If critics point to any weakness in Brand Funds, it’s that they sometimes appear to be “resting on their laurels.” Moreover, over time, economies of scale make early-stage investments less likely for large Brand Funds. The larger the AUM, the higher the minimum check size. Recently, Paradigm stated it will no longer write checks below $2 million — automatically excluding the vast majority of pre-seed opportunities.
Sometimes, brand ties closely to Twitter bios and cults of personality around general partners — superficial indicators that rarely translate into tangible operational value. I once interviewed an operator-turned-investor about why she made the switch. She replied that she didn’t want to get involved in the “dirty fight of Twitter thought leadership.” Now that’s well said!
Let’s talk about who came first, and why order matters. I love thinking about crypto — and watching mafia movies — so lately I’ve been pondering who the Five Families of crypto might be (or, for us, perhaps the Four Godfathers). If crypto were a mob syndicate — as we all know it sort of is — then which fund would sit atop all VIP funds as the ultimate VIP?
To me, the answer is obvious.
Blockchain Capital is a “founding-era fund,” tracing its roots back to 2013, with Brock Pierce among its three co-founders. Commonly referred to as “BCap” in casual conversation, it boasts one of the largest AUMs in the field and some of the most successful investment stories.
Then comes Pantera Capital. It's hard to compete with a fund led by renowned macro investor and early crypto enthusiast Dan Morehead. One of the most successful funds to date (by returns alone), it was also one of the first well-known funds to invest in crypto — launching its Bitcoin Fund in 2013 as its initial foray. Even more impressively, they’re now innovating with a new rolling fund structure and targeting billions in capital raises.
Fenbushi ranks third, founded in Shanghai in 2015, managing billions in AUM, and nurturing superstar young partners who are now spinning out to launch individual funds. Much of their AUM stems from being early in the space.
Digital Currency Group, founded by Barry Silbert in 2015, is now valued at $10 billion and stands among the oldest, most legendary, and best-known crypto companies in the world. It doesn’t accept external LPs, so technically it’s not a fund — but given the above rationale, I must include it on the list.
However, Brand Funds aren't just famous for being Tier-1. Some have grown powerful precisely because they deliver specific value. (If they didn’t offer unique advantages, they’d fall under All-Purpose Service/Value-Add Funds.)
Paradigm, launched in 2018, is more than just an early fund or a brand — it’s one of the best-performing funds during that period. Legendary figure Fred Ehrsam transitioned from Coinbase co-founder to becoming an absolutely top-tier investor. Paradigm has raised the largest crypto fund ever seen and is notoriously difficult to compete against. Among founders (and fellow investors), they’re favored for their unmatched technical expertise. (Justine Humenansky [justinehy.eth] asked every founder she met at conferences what their dream crypto VC was — and every single one said Paradigm.)
A16Z Crypto also began in 2018, making it an early entrant in the space. While many funds intentionally stay low-key, A16Z does the opposite — building an unparalleled media and PR machine. Under the leadership of former U.S. Assistant Attorney Katie Haun, their expertise and influence in regulation, law, and lobbying are widely seen as best-in-class among investors.
Parafi Capital, founded by Benjamin Forman in 2018, is another example. They explicitly focus on decentralized finance (in fact, among the very first funds dedicated to DeFi), but they also demonstrate unmatched involvement in governance of the protocols they support. My friend Justine Humenansky noted when discussing this list that in some ways, they represent a new kind of activist investor.
Multicoin Capital, founded in 2017, saw its first fund return approximately 200x. You could say they’re both a brand and genuinely smarter — known for contrarian bets (like Solana) that often pay off. We cannot ignore them.
Now turning to firms that aren’t inherently brands (or haven’t existed long enough to automatically qualify as Brand Funds), several stand out as distinctly smarter — delivering value-adds that aren’t hyper-specific yet substantial enough to establish their own brand identity.
Gumi Cryptos, started by Miko Matsumura in 2017, holds one of the strongest portfolios today. They recently closed their second fund in October, having backed category-leading projects like OpenSea, Yield Guild Gaming, Celsius Network, and Agoric at seed stage. I personally know some of their founders — open-minded leaders who welcome investment from Miko, a deep thinker capable of leading multiple fund investments. As a personal friend of Miko, I’ve yet to meet anyone matching his breadth of knowledge, critical thinking, and ability to connect and anticipate trends.
Arrington Capital, also launched in 2017, is another fund that successfully scaled to manage billions in AUM, assembling one of the sharpest and most agile investor rosters. Their founder Michael Arrington is known as a shrewd Silicon Valley investor whose name itself has become a brand. Having co-invested with them before, I can attest to their exceptionally deep research, brilliant team, and astonishing ability to source deal flow, conduct due diligence, and close investments rapidly.
We must also mention Polychain Capital, Dragonfly Capital, Reciprocal Ventures, Digital Finance Group, Bixin, Nima Capital, Kenetic Capital, Republic Crypto, Blockchange, Galaxy Digital (technically a crypto merchant bank, not just a VC), Coinfund, and Distributed Global.
These funds are relatively intelligent and may be considered brand funds — though their classification may stem more from smarts than longevity. Their founding years are: 2013 (Nima Capital), 2014 (Bixin), 2015 (Digital Finance Group, Coinfund), 2016 (Polychain, Reciprocal Ventures, Kenetic Capital), 2017 (gCC, XRP Arrington, Distributed Global, Republic Crypto, Blockchange), and 2018 (Dragonfly, Galaxy Digital).
Then come those strategically positioning themselves to be genuinely useful to founders seeking investment. In fact, our COO Richard Malone remarked on a call weeks ago that just as VCs ask founders, “What’s your tech stack?”, founders will eventually ask VCs, “What’s your venture capital stack?” Qualified full-service value-add investors will become “full-stack” VCs.
Funds aware of this reality can be considered relatively smart. Beyond the specific value-adds we discussed under the “specific value-add silo,” one value-add has grown especially popular: providing liquidity for decentralized finance. This is increasingly in demand among projects still finding their footing — today, investing sometimes requires providing liquidity support. GSR, Jump, Alameda, Efficient Frontier, Spartan, Wintermute, CMT, and CMS are among the largest market makers, all essential partners for teams launching DeFi protocols.
Many newly emerging specific value-add funds are forming as DAOs. 0xDAO offers liquidity exclusively to its DAO members and friends. Santiago Ramos recently launched a venture DAO with his friends. Some DAOs exist specifically to support certain types of founders (e.g., Komorebi Collective supports women and non-binary individuals in crypto). Operator DAOs are emerging. Even Shitcoin-focused DAOs are gaining traction. ByBit DAO, formed by the centralized exchange ByBit and seeded by Pantera, represents a major loop from centralization to decentralization — potentially one of the most fascinating social experiments on how massive AUM in crypto VC could emerge in a decentralized way.
Sometimes, the fund isn’t the investment vehicle — but the company itself remains a brand. For instance, Kenetic Capital (led by the exceptional Jehan Chu) and NIMA Capital (mentioned earlier) function as family offices but are regarded among the most active and successful crypto investors. HOF Capital is another family office that has carved out an elite niche in recent years, known as wildly aggressive investors under Corby Pryor’s leadership.
Another emerging specific value-add is design. IDEO Co-Lab specializes in helping founders design products, marketing materials, and even their Twitter presence.
Electric Capital is famous for publishing groundbreaking research relied upon by developers and investors when surveying the market.
Variant Fund focuses on Web3 and creator economy investments, connecting its founders with others across the creator vertical.
Tribe Capital is known for its machine learning capabilities, ranking among the best in deal sourcing.
Other types of specific value-add funds we can imagine are silo-specific. Recently, NFT-dedicated funds have emerged. SFermion comes to mind — focused purely on NFTs and soon transitioning into a DAO. Wave Financial reportedly has an NFT fund. Collab + Currency has shifted toward focusing primarily on NFTs. Metaverse funds, some investing directly in in-game assets, are gaining popularity (Galaxy Interactive may be the most prominent, along with Gemini’s metaverse fund, Metaversal — a joint venture with CoinFund — and Republic Realm, all newly launched). Katie Haun’s new fund will focus on the metaverse. Some themes are even geographically linked. Folius Ventures targets East and Southeast Asia as its primary mandate, as do Sky9 Capital, GBIC, David Gan’s OP Crypto, and several others.
Ecosystem funds are another form of specific value-add. Their main goal is supporting a Layer 1 ecosystem. Hypersphere gives you access to DOT, as they focus primarily on Polkadot ecosystem investments. Parity Ventures is another DOT ecosystem fund. Cosmos has a new fund called Tendermint. Terra has its own Terra ecosystem fund. Avalanche hosts multiple ecosystem funds. Algorand has Borderless Capital. Zilliqa has ZilliqaCapital. Solana alone has at least three related funds: Solar Ecosystem Fund, Solana Foundation, and Evernew Capital. NEAR has MetaWeb.VC. Even companies in the space are launching affiliated funds — Chainlink, for example, is rumored to be starting its own ecosystem fund. Most major exchanges run in-house venture arms (including Coinbase Ventures, Huobi Ventures, OKEX, etc.).
[Sometimes, funds focus on certain ecosystems without being purely ecosystem funds. For example, our friends at Valhalla Capital pay close attention to the Algorand ecosystem.]
Grant programs are essentially non-equity ecosystem funds. Notably, they bring significant value directly to the ecosystem, don’t operate as investments, and thus move at lightning speed. Some grant programs are more active than others (Polygon runs a well-known — albeit controversial — grants program; NEAR maintains an aggressive one where grants under $10k are auto-approved; Flare Network established a large grant pool; Uniswap and others are expanding their grant initiatives…).
There are also more general, loosely defined “value-add funds” — perhaps with smaller, tighter teams (and decent rosters thanks to longevity) and a platform lead whose impact ranges from vaguely helpful to overly intrusive. These teams find it harder to gain privileged access to crypto deals. Typically composed of young, nimble members who work hard and have good networks, but lack scale. In fact, many of these managers engage in investing primarily for business development purposes.
Finally, there are All-Purpose Value-Add Funds — usually beginning as incubators or accelerators. Consensys’ Ethereal Ventures is the clearest example. Thesis is another, as is Delphi Digital.
Yunt Capital is a DAO that has successfully positioned itself as an expert across all crypto “hotspots.” “When we invest, our eyes aren’t just on capital,” one of its founding members recently said. “We enjoy working with projects that want to collaborate with us, and we aim to provide guidance and advice on tokenomics, governance, and content — but we also offer comprehensive niche expertise.” With eighteen members who are sufficiently decentralized and well-connected, Yunt Capital has built a strong reputation as a value-add investor despite lacking a traditional fund structure. So too with 0xVentures DAO, which has eighty members — all heavy users across domains (“quants, NFT maxis, traders, gaming wizards, VCs, and developers” is just a sample), helping Yunt Capital build better products. Their support for founders includes content creation, strategic advising for major platforms, incubation, machine learning, node operation, code review, and more. Neither DAO currently has a token, but another group called New Order DAO operates similarly with value-add services in a DAO structure. Founded by Eden Dhaliwal, former partner at Outliers Ventures, their decentralized accelerator model is already working smoothly — their first product, Opytfi, has gained wide acclaim, and you can now buy their token publicly.
Original link:
https://mirror.xyz/0x38050A922eEFc7138E2D39082019908EA1D04a7A/Sz2MbTOAwRkISO-0eS6lkk2HjOkbeDktS3QiKAu5ejE
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
