
Delphi Digital: Solana Is Entering Its Most Aggressive Technical Upgrade Cycle in History
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected

Delphi Digital: Solana Is Entering Its Most Aggressive Technical Upgrade Cycle in History
While Ethereum is still scaling, Solana has already moved toward Alpenglow.
Author: Delphi Digital
Translation: Nicky, Foresight News
Solana's 2026 roadmap may be the most aggressive upgrade cycle in the network’s history—a comprehensive overhaul from consensus to infrastructure aimed at becoming a decentralized Nasdaq.
Solana’s roadmap is designed to transform it into an exchange-grade environment where native on-chain centralized limit order books (CLOBs) can compete with centralized exchanges (CEXs) in terms of latency, liquidity depth, and fairness. Below are all the upgrades that will make this possible.
Alpenglow: A Complete Consensus Overhaul
Alpenglow is the most significant protocol-layer change in Solana's history. It introduces an entirely new consensus architecture built around two core components: Votor and Rotor.
Votor fundamentally transforms how the network achieves consensus. Instead of chaining together multiple voting rounds, validators aggregate votes off-chain and submit finality within one or two rounds. The result is a theoretical finality time reduced from 12.8 seconds to just 100–150 milliseconds.
Votor runs two parallel finality paths. If a block receives overwhelming support (over 80% stake) in the first round, it achieves immediate finality. If support falls between 60% and 80%, a second round is triggered. If the second round also exceeds 60% support, the block is finalized. This design ensures finality even if parts of the network are unresponsive.
Rotor revolutionizes block propagation by directly routing messages through high-stake, high-bandwidth validators.
Alpenglow also introduces an “20+20” resilience model: security is maintained as long as malicious actors hold less than 20% of total stake; even if an additional 20% go offline, system liveness remains intact. This means Alpenglow can maintain finality even when up to 40% of nodes are malicious or offline.
Under Alpenglow, the Proof of History mechanism is effectively deprecated, replaced by deterministic slot scheduling and local timers. This upgrade is expected to launch in early to mid-2026.
Firedancer: Runtime Performance Improvements
Since its inception, Solana has relied on a single validator client (now called Agave). This monoculture has long been one of the network’s key vulnerabilities—any bug or failure at the client level could bring down the entire network.
Firedancer is a second independent validator client developed by Jump, written in C++. Its goal is to turn Solana validators into deterministic, high-throughput engines capable of processing millions of TPS with minimal latency variance.
Frankendancer is a transitional version that combines Firedancer’s networking and block production modules with Agave’s runtime and consensus components. As Firedancer reaches mainnet readiness, validator diversity is expected to increase significantly.
In this competitive environment, both teams have driven extensive iteration.
DoubleZero: High-Performance Fiber Infrastructure
DoubleZero is a private network overlay that connects validators via dedicated fiber optics—the same type of infrastructure used by traditional exchanges like Nasdaq and CME for microsecond-level transmission.
As the validator set grows, message propagation becomes more difficult. More nodes mean more destinations, introducing timing inconsistencies across the network. DoubleZero eliminates this by routing messages along optimal paths instead of bouncing them across the public internet.
Alpenglow’s finality model depends on validators receiving and responding to messages within strict time windows. Inconsistent propagation leads to delayed votes, slower quorum formation, and longer finality times. By minimizing latency differences among validators, DoubleZero enables faster finality for Votor and more uniform propagation for Rotor.
DoubleZero also supports multicast, duplicating data internally and delivering it simultaneously to all validators.
Block Building: BAM and Harmonic
Two complementary trends are reshaping Solana’s block-building layer:
BAM (Block Assembly Marketplace) is Jito’s reimagining of Solana’s transaction pipeline. Instead of letting slot leaders unilaterally decide transaction ordering, BAM inserts a market and privacy layer between ordering and execution. Transactions are routed into trusted execution environments (TEEs), meaning neither validators nor builders can see raw transaction content before ordering is finalized. This prevents opportunistic pre-execution behaviors such as frontrunning.
Harmonic addresses the other side of the pipeline—*who* builds blocks. It introduces an open block builder aggregation layer, allowing validators to accept real-time block proposals from multiple competing builders. Think of Harmonic as a meta-market, while BAM functions as a micro-market.
Raiku: Deterministic Execution Guarantees
Raiku fills the remaining gap. Solana has arguably solved most throughput bottlenecks, but natively offers no deterministic latency or programmable execution guarantees for specific applications. The granular control required for high-frequency trading (HFT)-style matching and on-chain centralized limit order books (CLOBs) goes far beyond what a Layer 1 (L1) should reasonably provide.
Raiku provides a scheduling/auction layer that runs parallel to Solana’s validator set, offering applications a programmable, deterministic pre-execution environment without modifying L1 consensus. It uses ahead-of-time (AOT) transactions to guarantee execution for pre-submitted workflows and just-in-time (JIT) transactions for real-time needs.
Bringing Capital Markets On-Chain
Among high-performance public blockchains, Solana remains dominant—but this dominance is meaningless without users and efficient on-chain markets. While the vast majority of meme coins still trade on Solana, on-chain perpetual futures markets are rapidly consolidating around a few platforms.
To compete with centralized players, performance must match theirs. We believe the Solana ecosystem recognizes this challenge and is optimistic about closing the gap. Upcoming upgrades are highly anticipated, and new native perpetual exchanges like BULK are set to launch early this year.
Retail demand for trading spot assets on Solana remains strong. While Hyperliquid currently dominates perpetuals, Solana has established itself as the preferred L1 for trading any spot pair. Centralized exchanges still lead by a wide margin, but Solana is currently the go-to solution for on-chain trading.
Products like xStocks are bringing on-chain stocks directly to Solana. Liquidity, price discovery, and speculative attention are converging on this single chain that offers faster settlement, better user experience, and denser capital efficiency.
This is why Solana is bringing capital markets on-chain.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News














