Bitget 2025 Global Market Year-End Review: Dollar Retreat, AI Frenzy, Crypto Reshuffle, Gold and Silver Peak
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
Bitget 2025 Global Market Year-End Review: Dollar Retreat, AI Frenzy, Crypto Reshuffle, Gold and Silver Peak
This will be a difficult year, and it will also be a great year.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insights
Preface
Standing at the end of 2025 and looking back on the global capital markets of this year, we have witnessed not just the rise and fall of numbers, but a profound paradigm revolution. As Trump returned to the White House, as NVIDIA's market capitalization broke through $5 trillion, as gold historically stood above $4,000, as Bitcoin experienced violent fluctuations amidst policy games—we realized that the old world order is disintegrating, and the contours of the new era are not yet clear.
This year, the market sought order amidst chaos, firmly betting on seemingly minor yet certain trends amid high uncertainty. The return of political strongmen ignited the flames of policy uncertainty, the breakneck advance of artificial intelligence fueled the expansion of the trillion-dollar club, and the loosening of monetary order triggered a restructuring of global asset pricing.
I. Macro Changes – Order Restructuring Amid Power Games
The Trump Trade: From Threat to Predictable Policy Tool
On January 20, 2025, Trump took the oath of office for the second time, and global capital markets entered the "Policy Reassessment Era." Trump's "MAGA 2.0" policy package contains three core elements: the weaponization of trade protectionism, the radicalization of fiscal expansion, and the localization of industrial reshoring. This policy mix essentially trades global efficiency for domestic political stability.
The tariff farce in April became the most representative event of the year. On April 2, Trump imposed "reciprocal tariffs" on major trading partners. The S&P 500 index plummeted 9% that week, wiping out over $5 trillion in global stock market value. However, just a week later, on April 9, a sudden announcement of a 90-day tariff suspension led to a rapid market rebound of 5.7%, marking the largest single-week gain since November 2020.
This cycle of "policy threat – market panic – policy concession – market euphoria" was a meticulously designed political economy experiment. The market gradually learned to find signals amidst the noise, with "TACO trade" becoming a buzzword. By October, when Trump threatened tariffs again, the panic index only rose to 22, far below the 38 in April, indicating that the market had come to view Trump's tariff threats as a predictable policy tool, not a true "black swan."
The essence of Trumponomics is using policy uncertainty as a negotiation tool to find a dynamic balance between protectionism and globalization. While this model increases short-term volatility, it also creates significant alpha opportunities for investors who can accurately predict policy directions. In 2026, as the election approaches, this policy game will become more frequent, and the market will need to learn to find patterns within the chaos.
The Fed's Difficult Choice: The Dilemma of Fighting Inflation and Preventing Recession
At the Jackson Hole conference on August 22, Powell publicly acknowledged for the first time that "the path to rate cuts is clear," and the market immediately priced in 75 basis points of cuts for the year. This prediction proved quite accurate – rate cuts in September, October, and December lowered the federal funds rate from 4.5% to 3.75%.
More notably, on December 10, the RMP (Reserve Management Purchase plan) was announced, with the Fed stating it would purchase $40 billion in short-term Treasury bonds monthly. This is essentially a form of quantitative easing in disguise. Between debt monetization and inflation control, the Fed is finding it difficult to balance both.
Looking ahead to 2026, the Fed faces an even more complex situation. Powell's term will end in May 2026, and the policy stance of his successor remains unclear. If Trump is re-elected, he may appoint a more dovish chair, further weakening the Fed's independence. Meanwhile, inflation is not yet fully tamed. Against this backdrop, the Fed's policy space is very limited. Continuing to cut rates could reignite inflation; stopping easing too early could trigger a recession.
This dilemma means that the monetary policy path in 2026 will be more tortuous, and market volatility will remain elevated. Investors need to closely monitor the wording changes in every FOMC meeting, seeking trading opportunities in the subtle differences of policy.
Undercurrents in Dollar Hegemony: Credit Depreciation and Multipolar Trends
In the macro narrative of 2025, the most far-reaching change was the quiet loosening of the dollar's status. The dollar index plummeted 12.5% for the year, plunging from the 110 level at the start of the year to a low of 96.37 in July, marking its worst six-month performance since the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1973.
This crisis stemmed from a "triple threat": narrowing U.S. economic advantages, weakening the incentive for capital to flow to the U.S.; depletion of U.S. fiscal credibility, with international investors beginning to demand higher risk premiums (the share of U.S. Treasuries held by foreign investors hit a 20-year low); and the disappearance of interest rate differential advantages, with the Fed cutting rates while other central banks held steady.
The dollar's weakness cast a wide influence on asset prices: a comprehensive rise in commodities, with gold, silver, copper, aluminum, and other dollar-denominated commodity prices collectively soaring. Secondly, there was a broad appreciation of non-dollar currencies, with the euro rising from 1.03 to 1.17 against the dollar, and the renminbi rising from 7.2 to 7.0 against the dollar. Finally, the attractiveness of emerging market assets increased, with the MSCI Emerging Markets Index rising 28% for the year, outperforming the S&P 500 by nearly 13 percentage points.
Of course, the loosening of dollar hegemony does not equal its collapse. The dollar still holds an absolute dominant position in global foreign exchange reserves and international trade settlements.
But history tells us that the decline of a hegemony often begins with erosion at the edges, not a collapse at the center. The pound sterling was still the world's largest reserve currency in 1914, but by the 1944 Bretton Woods conference, the dollar had taken its place. This process took 30 years. While the challenges facing the dollar today may not be as severe as those faced by the pound back then, the trend towards multipolarity is clearly visible. For investors, the key is not to predict when dollar hegemony will end, but to find structural opportunities in the multipolarization process—whether in physical assets, non-dollar currencies, or emerging markets benefiting from currency diversification.
II. Crypto Market – The First Year of Compliance Under Policy Dominance
From Wild West to Formalization: Policy Becomes the Greatest Alpha
If one word were to summarize the cryptocurrency market in 2025, it would be "the first year of compliance." This year, crypto assets completely bid farewell to the speculative frenzy of the wild west era and entered an institutionalized cycle dominated by policy. From Trump's executive orders to congressional legislation, from strategic reserves to the ETF explosion, the clarification of the U.S. regulatory framework not only did not stifle the industry but instead catalyzed a historic market run.
Bitcoin's trajectory in 2025 presented a clear "three-stage rocket" model, with each stage catalyzed by specific policies.
The first-stage rocket ignited on January 20. After formally taking office, Trump signed a pro-crypto executive order, clearly opposing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and establishing the strategic position of the private crypto industry. This statement directly removed the "regulatory sword of Damocles" that had haunted the market for years. Investors began to believe that cryptocurrencies would not face a regulatory iron fist like in 2022 but would receive policy treatment equal to traditional finance. Bitcoin quickly climbed from $74,000 at the start of the year, touching a phase high of $109,600 on January 20. Mainstream tokens like Ethereum and Solana rose in sync, with the total crypto market capitalization breaking through $3 trillion.
The second-stage rocket ignited on March 6. Trump signed the "Executive Order on Establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve," announcing that the U.S. government would establish a national-level Bitcoin reserve to address future currency crises. This policy was not only official recognition of Bitcoin's value but also elevated cryptocurrencies from fringe assets to sovereign-level strategic assets. However, the thrust of the second-stage rocket was soon offset by macro factors. From March to April, under the evolving risk of Trump's tariff conflicts, global risk assets came under pressure, and Bitcoin once fell back to a low of $74,500.
The true main surge came from the third-stage rocket – legislative enactment. On July 18, the "GENIUS Stablecoin Act" was formally passed by Congress, marking the acquisition of a complete legal framework for cryptocurrencies in the United States. This cleared the final obstacle for traditional financial capital to enter the crypto market and was seen as a signal for large-scale entry. In July, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETF inflows reached $8.9 billion, the highest for the year. Bitcoin's price soared from $92,000 at the start of July, breaking through $120,000 by the end of July and touching a new all-time high of $124,470. Traditional asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity became major buyers. Public companies began incorporating Bitcoin into their balance sheets. MicroStrategy increased its Bitcoin holdings by over 150,000 for the year, with tech companies like Tesla and Block following suit.
The Warning of the 10.11 Crash: Macro Factors Remain Dominant
However, behind the euphoria, risks were accumulating. The "10.11 crash" in October became the most brutal scene of the year and taught the crypto market a profound lesson.
In early October, Bitcoin continued its strong momentum, surging to a new high of $126,000 on October 7. The market widely expected that with continued ETF inflows and global liquidity easing, Bitcoin would advance towards $150,000. However, on the evening of October 10, a sudden piece of news shattered all illusions.
Trump threatened on social media that if China did not make concessions in trade negotiations, he would impose 100% tariffs on Chinese goods. This statement immediately triggered a risk-off sentiment in global risk assets. Asian stock markets opened sharply lower on Friday, with the A-share market falling 3.2% in a single day and the Hang Seng Index dropping 4.1%. When U.S. markets opened, the S&P 500 opened 2.8% lower, and the Nasdaq fell 3.5%.
The reaction in the cryptocurrency market was even more severe. Bitcoin began a waterfall decline in the early hours of October 11, plummeting from $126,000 to $101,000 in just 12 hours, a drop of nearly 20%. Mainstream tokens like Ethereum and Solana fell even more, by 25% and 32% respectively. The total liquidation amount across the network reached $19.8 billion, setting the third-highest record in history, second only to the two crashes in May 2021 and November 2022.
This crash exposed the vulnerability of the crypto market: when macro systemic risks descended, Bitcoin did not function as a safe-haven asset but instead became one of the first high-risk assets to be sold off. The highly leveraged trading structure exacerbated the stampede effect, with a large number of long positions being forcibly liquidated, forming a negative feedback loop.
Paradigm Shift: From Technical Narrative to Macro Narrative
Looking back on the entire year of 2025, Bitcoin started at $74,000, touched a high of $126,000, and ended the year around $90,000, with an annual decline of approximately 6.6%. In stark contrast, gold rose 70% for the year, silver rose 124%, with physical precious metals completely outperforming digital assets.
This outcome triggered deep reflection in the market: What exactly is Bitcoin? Is it a tool for hedging inflation, a safe-haven asset against currency depreciation, or merely a speculative vehicle during periods of loose liquidity? The 2025 trend provided a harsh answer: Bitcoin failed to demonstrate safe-haven attributes during the multiple crises of 2025, instead behaving as a high-beta tool extremely sensitive to liquidity withdrawal.
The deeper issue lies in the fundamental change in the pricing factors of the crypto market. In the past, Bitcoin's price was primarily driven by on-chain metrics (active address count, transaction volume) and industry events (halving, technical upgrades, hacks). But the market performance in 2025 shows that macro factors such as the Fed's monetary policy, U.S. fiscal policy, and global geopolitics are becoming increasingly important influences on Bitcoin's price.
This means Bitcoin has become deeply embedded in the traditional financial system and is no longer an "alternative asset" independent of the macroeconomy. Industry positives can hardly offset macro negatives. When the Fed signals hawkishness, when geopolitical risks heat up, when global liquidity tightens, regardless of how much policy support the crypto industry has or how many institutions enter, Bitcoin's price struggles to remain unscathed. The macro beta attribute of crypto assets has become an unavoidable reality.
The "digital gold" narrative needs time to be validated. For Bitcoin to truly become a widely accepted store of value, it needs to at least go through a complete economic recession cycle, proving its resilience during a crisis. Until then, positioning Bitcoin as a "high-risk growth asset" rather than a "safe-haven asset" might be a more realistic attitude. In 2026, the crypto market's trajectory will still depend primarily on the macro liquidity environment and policy regulatory progress. Investors need to be psychologically prepared to handle high volatility.
III. U.S. Stock Market – AI Bubble, Power Revolution, and Valuation Restructuring
Two Shocks to the AI Bubble: Dual Interrogation of Technology and Business Models
The U.S. stock market in 2025 continued its strong momentum, with the three major indices frequently refreshing historical highs. By year-end, the Nasdaq Composite Index had accumulated a 22% gain, the S&P 500 rose 17%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 14%.
The AI narrative remained one of the main guides for the U.S. stock market's direction. Google rose over 66%, posting the largest gain among the "Magnificent Seven" thanks to its Gemini breakthrough; NVIDIA rose over 40%, breaking through a $5 trillion market capitalization; the AI industry chain blossomed comprehensively: data center construction propelled NEBIUS to surge 225%, CoreWeave rose over 100%; memory chips ushered in a "super cycle" due to the AI data explosion, with Micron Technology skyrocketing 230%; on the software side, Palantir rose 157%, Applovin rose 125%; AI healthcare stock Guardant Health rose over 235%.
This seemed like another tech-led bull market, but profound structural changes had occurred within the market. The most shocking event of the year was undoubtedly the two shocks to the AI valuation bubble.
The first shock came from the technological level. On January 27, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-V3 open-source large language model, with a training cost of only $5.6 million, compared to over $100 million for GPT-4. This news sent shockwaves through the global AI industry, startling the market: Could the massive capital expenditure moats built by giants be breached by low-cost, high-efficiency model architectures? On January 27 alone, NVIDIA plummeted 17%, wiping out nearly $600 billion in market value, marking the largest single-day loss in U.S. stock market history. The chip index fell over 9%, Broadcom dropped 17%, and TSMC fell 13%.
This "DeepSeek shockwave" became a watershed moment for 2025. The market began to re-examine whether the technological barriers behind the high valuations of AI giants were solid and the payback period for massive capital expenditures. However, NVIDIA subsequently gradually restored confidence with solid earnings reports. Wall Street analysts widely argued that DeepSeek's breakthrough would not threaten its business; instead, by lowering the barrier to AI use, it would accelerate industry adoption, thereby expanding the overall market size. NVIDIA's stock price soared along with its performance, and on October 28, NVIDIA broke through a $5 trillion market capitalization, becoming the first publicly listed company in human history to surpass $5 trillion.
The second shock targeted business models. On September 10, Oracle and OpenAI signed a $300 billion computing power procurement agreement, stipulating that OpenAI would purchase computing power from Oracle between 2027 and 2032. This deal caused Oracle's stock price to surge 35% in a single day. But the market soon questioned this "AI circular trading" model: suppliers investing in customers, who then purchase services—is this value creation or a financial game?
These doubts were validated after Oracle released its quarterly earnings report. Although revenue grew 28% year-over-year, new orders from external customers fell short of expectations, with most growth coming from transactions with related parties like OpenAI and CoreWeave. Free cash flow growth was only 12%, far below revenue growth, indicating issues with business quality. The market reacted immediately, with Oracle's stock price falling from its September high all the way down, ending the year with a 45% decline, nearly halving.
These two upheavals together revealed a new reality for AI investment: the market has moved from a "narrative chase" phase into an "earnings validation" phase. Capital is no longer blindly buying into the capital expenditure stories of giants but is starting to focus on the actual implementation and commercial returns of AI applications.
Power Shortage Spurs a New Theme: Investment Shift from Computing Power to Energy
As the market grew cautious about pure AI software and hardware valuations, a new investment theme emerged: power infrastructure. In a report released in October, Morgan Stanley pointed out that as AI infrastructure construction accelerates, U.S. data center electricity demand is rising sharply, with an expected power gap of up to 44 gigawatts by 2028, equivalent to the output of 44 nuclear power plants.
Capital markets quickly sniffed out the opportunity, and power-related concept stocks became new favorites. The first investment theme was the nuclear power revival. Oklo Inc. surged 280% during the year, Centrus Energy rose nearly 300%, Energy Fuels rose nearly 200%, and GE Vernova rose over 100%. These companies share a common characteristic: a focus on small modular reactors (SMRs), offering advantages like short construction cycles, flexible siting, and high safety.
The second investment theme was fuel cells and energy storage. Bloom Energy rose 327% during the year, becoming the top gainer among power stocks. The company's solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology can directly convert natural gas into electricity, and its installations can be completed on-site without relying on the grid, making it ideal for providing distributed power to data centers. Companies like Alphabet and Apple have deployed Bloom Energy's fuel cell systems on their campuses, with a total installed capacity exceeding 800 megawatts.
Broadening Market Breadth: From Tech Stock Solo to Multi-Sector Chorus
Another important characteristic of the 2025 U.S. stock market was the significant broadening of the rally's scope. While tech stocks remained the engine, traditional sectors like industrials, financials, and energy began contributing considerable returns. The market was shifting from a "tech stock solo" to a "multi-sector chorus."
Data shows that 79% of the S&P 500's 2025 gains came from earnings growth rather than valuation expansion, and the rally broadened from tech to sectors like financials, industrials, and utilities. Despite overall valuations being at a historical 91st percentile high, the "Magnificent Seven," which contributed 43% of returns, had a relative valuation of only 15%. Meanwhile, since the U.S. stock market hit a short-term low on November 20, the Russell 2000 small-cap index has risen 11%, while the "Magnificent Seven" tech index has risen only half as much.
As 2026 approaches, an increasingly clear consensus is forming on Wall Street: the tech giants that led the bull market in recent years will no longer be the market's sole protagonists; sector rotation will become the investment theme of the new year. Goldman Sachs stated that global stock markets in 2025 have shown a clear trend of broadening sector gains and rotation, a trend that will continue to strengthen in 2026, breaking the previous pattern of high concentration in AI tech stocks. Therefore, in 2026, non-U.S. and non-tech sectors will continue to show strong performance under rotation. Morgan Stanley analysts hold a similar view: large-cap tech stocks can still perform well but will lag behind new leading areas, especially consumer goods and small-to-mid-cap stocks.
This means investors need to step out of their comfort zone in tech stocks, seek opportunities in traditional sectors, and shift from tech giants to lower-valued traditional cyclical stocks, small caps, and economically sensitive sectors like healthcare, industrials, energy, and financials.
IV. Commodities – Resonance of Fiat Credit Depreciation and Physical Scarcity
Gold Breaks $4,000: A Vote of No Confidence in the Fiat System
In 2025, physical assets experienced a rare super bull market, with prices of commodities like gold, silver, and copper collectively soaring. This was not simply inflation hedging but a global vote of no confidence in the credit of the fiat monetary system. When sovereign debt balloons, fiscal discipline slackens, and monetary policy credibility declines, only physical assets without sovereign credit can provide a true margin of safety.
Gold's performance was the most astonishing. At the start of the year, spot gold was priced at $2,624 per ounce; by year-end, the price had climbed above the $4,200 mark, with an annual gain exceeding 70%, marking its strongest performance since 1979. Even more impressive was the persistence of the rally—gold closed higher in 9 out of 12 months, with only 3 months closing lower, a trend strength that was remarkable.
The logic driving gold prices underwent a structural change. Traditional theory holds that gold prices are negatively correlated with real U.S. Treasury yields, but this correlation weakened in 2025. The 10-year Treasury yield rose above 4.6%, hitting its highest level since May, yet gold rose 70%. This indicates the pricing logic has shifted from "interest rate pricing" to "credit pricing"—investors are no longer focused on the opportunity cost of holding gold but on the credit risk of holding fiat assets.
In this context, gold's role is not to hedge short-term inflation or market volatility but to hedge long-term monetary credit risk. It is an "ultimate insurance"—it may underperform other assets in normal times but can preserve or even increase value when a systemic crisis erupts. The 2025 trend reinforced this positioning, with more and more institutional investors incorporating gold into long-term strategic allocations.
Silver Frenzy: From Monetary Attribute to New Industrial Critical Material
If gold's rise was primarily driven by its monetary attribute, then silver's surge benefited from both its monetary and industrial attributes. Silver rose 140% for the year, skyrocketing from $29 per ounce at the start of the year to nearly $80 per ounce by year-end. Its momentum far exceeded gold's, making it the best-performing commodity of 2025.
Silver's monetary attribute is similar to gold's; against the backdrop of a depreciating dollar and questioned sovereign credit, silver also attracted buying. Compared to gold's high threshold of over $4,000 per ounce, silver's low unit price makes it more accessible to individual investors.
The explosion in industrial demand was also a factor driving silver's surge. Three major sectors—photovoltaics, AI, and new energy vehicles—became new demand engines for silver: major global economies are accelerating photovoltaic deployment; for AI chips, silver is indispensable in high-performance chips; for electric vehicles, each EV uses an average of about 55 grams of silver, mainly in battery management systems, motors, and charging stations.
However, silver also experienced several sharp rises and falls in 2025. On April 4, due to liquidity tightness triggered by tariff fears, silver plummeted 7.06% in a single day, with a cumulative maximum drop of over 15% in two days. On October 21, London spot silver plunged 7.11% in a day, marking its largest drop since early 2021, with a three-day cumulative decline of 11.7%. These flash crashes were not the end of the trend but violent cleansings of excessive leverage and floating profits. After each deep correction, silver prices quickly recovered their losses and reached new highs.
Looking ahead to 2026, major banks generally predict that silver's super-cycle logic remains intact. Investment banks like Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, and Citigroup have raised their target prices, generally expecting silver to reach $100 per ounce in 2026. Of course, high volatility also implies high risk. For investors, psychological preparation to withstand剧烈波动 is necessary.
Divergence Between Precious Metals and Crude Oil: The Deep Impact of Energy Transition
In stark contrast to the prosperity of precious metals was the weakness of crude oil. Brent crude oil prices fell from $78 per barrel at the start of the year, briefly rebounding to $78 in June due to Middle East conflicts but soon retreating, ending the year around $62, with an annual decline exceeding 20%. This structural shift means oil is transitioning from a "growth commodity" to a "sunset commodity." While geopolitical conflicts may still cause oil price spikes in the short term, the long-term trend is demand shrinkage and supply surplus.
The divergence between precious metals and crude oil is essentially the replacement of old and new energy systems. Investors need to recognize that traditional commodity cycle logic is becoming obsolete, and the long-term trend of energy transition will continue to reshape the commodity landscape. New energy materials like copper, lithium, nickel, and cobalt will continue to benefit, while the long-term prospects for oil, natural gas, and coal are dim. This is not a simple cyclical fluctuation but a paradigm shift.
Conclusion: Maintaining Reverence and Courage, Diversification is More Important Than Ever
Looking back on 2025, we witnessed too many "impossibilities" happening: Trump returning to the White House, NVIDIA breaking $5 trillion, gold standing above $4,000, Bitcoin's policy-driven rollercoaster, the dollar's worst performance in half a century. These events collectively point to one reality: we are at the forefront of a paradigm revolution, the old order is disintegrating, and new rules are not yet established.
In such an era, the greatest challenge of investing is not predicting the future but maintaining clarity amidst uncertainty. The market rewards those who maintain both reverence and courage—reverence means recognizing one's cognitive boundaries and admitting black swans are unpredictable; courage means firm execution once the direction is confirmed, not being scared off by short-term fluctuations.
2025 taught us three core lessons:
First, policy has become the greatest source of alpha. Whether it's the compliance of cryptocurrencies, the tariff games in U.S. stocks, or the currency depreciation logic for commodities, policy factors are the driving force behind them. Traditional fundamental analysis remains important, but if one cannot accurately predict policy directions, even the most sophisticated models will fail. Investors need to build a macro policy analysis framework and closely track policy dynamics in the U.S., China, the EU, and Japan.
Second, the lifecycle of narratives is shortening. In the past, a good story could drive stock prices for years (like FAANG from 2017-2021). But in 2025, from the DeepSeek shock to the Oracle debacle, the market's speed of validating narratives accelerated dramatically. This requires investors not to stay at the "storytelling" stage but to delve into business details and verify the sustainability of business models. Those investors who only chase hot topics without deep research will face even more painful losses in 2026.
Third, diversification is more important than ever. In 2025, the risks of single asset class exposure were laid bare: those holding single tech stocks suffered heavy losses in the DeepSeek shock; those holding single cryptocurrencies were liquidated in the 10.11 crash; those holding single fiat currencies saw their wealth shrink in currency depreciation. Only investors who maintained balanced allocations across stocks, bonds, commodities, and alternative assets achieved steady returns.
Looking ahead to 2026, we will face a year that is even more turbulent and full of opportunities. The U.S. election, the Fed chair transition, the Middle East situation, AI commercialization, energy transition—each variable could trigger market shocks. But as Buffett said: "Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful—but most importantly, never waste a crisis."
Crisis is opportunity. When dollar hegemony loosens, the window opens for allocating physical assets; when the AI bubble bursts, truly valuable applications surface; when the market panics and sells off, quality assets appear at discounted prices. The key is to maintain a cool head, ample cash reserves, and readiness to strike at any time.
The paradigm revolution of 2025 tells us: the future is not predicted; it is shaped by every decision, every trade, and every act of perseverance today.
Let us move firmly towards 2026, carrying the lessons of 2025, reverence for uncertainty, and a thirst for opportunity.
It will be a difficult year, and it will be a great year.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
