Base vs. Solana Founder's Century-Long Debate: When ZORA Surges 883% Meets the "Zero Value Theory"
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
Base vs. Solana Founder's Century-Long Debate: When ZORA Surges 883% Meets the "Zero Value Theory"
$ZORA vs $PUMP, Base vs Solana.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insightsAuthor: Fairy, ChainCatcher
The founders of two major public blockchains go head-to-head, filling Crypto Twitter with tension.
An intense debate centered on "creator tokens" has ignited the crypto community. Founders of Base and Solana—rarely seen engaging directly—have stepped into the ring, clashing over platforms ZORA and Pump.fun.
What sparked this confrontation? Let's start from the beginning.
The Flashpoint: Sterling Crispin’s Challenge
This war of words in the crypto world began when Del Complex researcher Sterling Crispin publicly questioned Zora.
Zora is a social networking platform on the Base ecosystem that tokenizes user profiles and posts, aiming to help creators monetize their content directly.
But in Sterling’s view, Zora is merely repackaged old ideas. He bluntly stated that most tokens issued on automated market makers (AMMs) with extremely low liquidity and exponential price curves are still just "re-skinned shitcoins."
In discussions with community members, he cited Pump.fun as an example: "The median outcome for ERC20 tokens on Pump.fun isn’t underperforming the market—it’s going to zero."
In response to this sharp criticism, Base founder Jesse Pollak quickly went on defense. On X, he said: "I think you're wrong. Content has value, creators have value." He further emphasized, "Treating assets issued on Pump.fun and Zora as equivalent is a logical fallacy. Not all tokens are the same—fundamentals matter."
However, Jesse’s remarks soon triggered another heavyweight—Solana founder toly.
Solana Founder Jumps In, Escalating the Conflict
Solana founder toly swiftly entered the fray, retweeting Jesse’s post on X with sarcasm: "lol wut? Do tokens on Zora grant any rights to future cash flows from creators?"
From there, the battle between the two founders officially began:
Round One: Does content have "intrinsic value"?
Jesse firmly asserted: Content itself has intrinsic value.
toly asked: How do you prove it has intrinsic value? Do token holders have rights to share future ad revenue from content?
Jesse replied: Advertising is just one monetization method. Like a painting—it still has value even if no one pays for admission.
toly pressed on: By that logic, is it good for retail investors when creators dump Zora tokens? Because then retail can buy below the intrinsic value of the content?
Jesse attempted to explain: There are many types of tokens on Zora, but they share one thing: they’re part of a repeated, infinite game where participants’ actions influence the entire system.
Round Two: A stalemate with no surrender
toly wasn’t convinced, coldly remarking: Sounds like their "intrinsic value" is zero.
Jesse stood his ground: If you want to believe content has zero value, that’s your choice. But I believe content is extremely valuable, and we can build new systems to return that value to billions of creators.
toly delivered a final blow: Then go convince token holders to get Coinbase to use its profits to buy up those nearly worthless Zora tokens because they’re "below the intrinsic value of content."
The exchange resembled a childish quarrel—neither side backing down—ending abruptly with Jesse’s simple "OK."
Ironically, toly himself has spent years promoting Solana-based meme coins. Yet this time, to strengthen his argument, he added: "I’ve said for years that meme coins and NFTs are digital garbage with no inherent value—just like loot box items in mobile games, which people spend $150 billion on annually."
Zora’s Pump Performance
Zora—the focal point of this verbal battle—not only enjoys support from Base founder Jesse Pollak but also saw its token $ZORA surge 883% over the past month. This rally was fueled by positive news such as Base App integrating content tokenization features and Binance listing the ZORA/USDT perpetual contract.
Yesterday, Zora reached record highs: 21,478 creators on the platform, including 12,292 new ones, issuing a total of 50,475 tokens.
Yet on-chain data tells a different story. According to on-chain analyst AI Auntie, in the spot market, Coinbase leads trading volume for the token, with a 24-hour turnover of $82.6 million; in derivatives, Binance’s 24-hour volume hits $1.354 billion—16.4 times higher than spot.
She noted that while ZORA appears to be riding an independent altcoin wave, recent on-chain records don’t even show a single transaction above $500,000, suggesting funds on centralized exchanges may be driving the action.
Image source: AI Auntie
The fierce clash between Jesse and toly not only reveals deep divisions within the crypto world over the nature of "creator tokens," but also reflects the complex competition and ideological conflicts between blockchain ecosystems.
There are no winners in this debate—much like the ongoing struggle over how value is defined, constantly torn between idealism and reality, faith and skepticism.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
ChainCatcher 链捕手
