
DeFi Needs to Move Beyond Wrapped Tokens
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected

DeFi Needs to Move Beyond Wrapped Tokens
If we continue to rely on wrapped tokens, we may undermine rather than advance mass adoption of DeFi.
Written by: SIMON HARMAN
Compiled by: TechFlow

Technological evolution is a brutal process, littered throughout history with abandoned innovations. Just as landlines gave way to mobile phones and email replaced fax machines, it seems wrapped tokens may eventually become exhibits in the blockchain technology museum.
They were essentially just temporary solutions for cross-chain interoperability, yet we've had to accept them as a necessary part of interacting with the DeFi world for far too long. During the DeFi summer, people talked about a bright future where composability truly extended across chains—but that hasn't materialized.
In my view, if we continue relying on wrapped tokens, we may be undermining rather than advancing mass adoption of DeFi.
Before we relegate wrapped tokens to history, let's examine the role they've played.
Undeniably, wrapped tokens provided significant help during DeFi’s early stages, offering holders of these assets opportunities to lend, trade, and more on Ethereum.
But using wrapped tokens introduces counterparty risk—a concept that shouldn’t exist in a truly decentralized financial system. Every issuance of a wrapped token requires ongoing trust in third-party custodians or protocols unrelated to the underlying blockchain. If these services fail, not only individual users suffer losses, but the entire ecosystem could face catastrophic consequences.
Moreover, we must also trust issuers’ ability to maintain the peg between the underlying asset and its wrapped representation. As we’ve seen with projects like TerraUSD, such pegs can collapse rapidly, adding further unnecessary risk. The FTX collapse was another stark reminder that existing risks can threaten survival itself.
Beyond systemic concerns, wrapped tokens have also proven vulnerable to major security challenges. By relying on cross-chain bridges to move assets between blockchains, we expose user funds to unnecessarily high levels of risk. We need only recall the Ronin bridge hack to understand the massive losses such breaches can cause.
To prevent erosion of user trust, we must move beyond wrapped tokens.
Even if the trust assumptions required by wrapped tokens don’t seem to bother most everyday users, I believe this added layer of trust creates worse side effects.
Since each representation of a given asset is issued on another chain, these representations are not interchangeable. For example, WBTC and TBTC cannot be deployed together as BTC liquidity in a single pool. Instead, having both causes fragmentation, damaging each other’s chance of achieving sufficient liquidity to remain competitive.
Each wrapped version of an asset means more liquidity and users are diluted across that asset’s markets on different chains. We already have too many stablecoins, too many bridges, and too many wrapping services. Contrary to the promise of saving users money, this fragmentation actually makes everything less efficient and more expensive, undermining true composability.
But slowly, we’re beginning to see this trend reverse. USDC and USDT are now natively issued on dozens of chains, greatly improving dollar-denominated markets across all these ecosystems. As this trend continues, the popularity and utility of wrapped dollars will vanish permanently.
In the ever-evolving field of blockchain technology, the obsolescence of wrapped tokens seems inevitable. While they played a helpful role in the early days of cross-chain ecosystems and sparked interest and growth in DeFi, their time is coming to an end.
Attention and resources once focused on wrapped tokens should now shift toward developing faster, more user-friendly, and native cross-chain methods. To build a more inclusive, secure, and robust financial system for everyone, we must move toward decentralization—making decentralized cross-chain swap solutions a core component of our DeFi ecosystem.
To me, continued reliance on wrapped tokens directly delays mass open access to DeFi. The industry needs to transition toward true decentralization, improve the DeFi ecosystem, and render wrapped tokens obsolete.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News














