Eight Major Global Central Banks Enter the Arena—Are They After a Slice of the Stablecoin Pie?
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
Eight Major Global Central Banks Enter the Arena—Are They After a Slice of the Stablecoin Pie?
The Agorá project, led by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), targets institutional stablecoin markets.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insightsBy: Thejaswini M A
Translated by: Chopper, Foresight News
Thousands of years ago, the ancient Greek Agorá was a public marketplace in Athens—a space open to all, where free exchange occurred without entry barriers or territorial jurisdictional constraints. The term’s original meaning is precisely “permissionless.”
It is telling that the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) named its project Agorá. Yet the actual design of the Agorá project—led by the BIS and jointly implemented by seven central banks alongside more than 40 private-sector institutions—is diametrically opposed to the notion of a “free marketplace.”
Within this system, funds are pre-tagged with their country of origin before transfer; smart contracts automatically perform anti-money laundering (AML) screening and sanctions list verification at the token layer; each central bank retains full control over its own reserve holdings; and cross-border fund flows must pass through a built-in compliance verification layer embedded within the tokens.
In short, this is a programmable fiat currency system requiring prior approval for every action.
The seven central banks participating in the Agorá project are: the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Korea, the Bank of Mexico, the Swiss National Bank, and the Banque de France (representing the euro area). The Bank of Canada joined the initiative just four days ago. Financial giants—including JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, UBS, Mastercard, Visa, and the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT)—alongside over 40 other institutions, jointly participated in its development.
Given the unprecedented scale of institutional involvement, I decided to conduct an in-depth analysis of this system.
The project adopts a two-tiered, segregated architecture: one tier—fully controlled by national central banks—manages underlying base money reserves; the other tier—operated by commercial banks—handles day-to-day transactions for end users. Tokenized commercial bank deposits are pooled onto a shared platform, where multi-currency clearing is jointly processed by multiple private-sector institutions; meanwhile, central bank reserves remain held separately on sovereign-ledger accounts, ensuring monetary sovereignty remains firmly in the hands of each respective central bank.
The BIS aims to build a state-controlled, closed-loop payment system by integrating commercial bank ledgers and anchoring them to national sovereign reserves. Institutions are accelerating the rollout of regulatory-compliant frameworks, seeking to complete deployment before decentralized stablecoins like Tether fully decouple global trade from traditional banking infrastructure.
Current cross-border payments resemble a relay race: message transmission, manual compliance checks, and ledger settlement occur across disparate institutional systems—often taking several days. The Agorá project compresses this lengthy, multi-step coordination into a single, instantaneous on-chain operation. Its prototype concluded successfully on May 27, 2026, immediately followed by the Bank of Canada’s formal accession.
Organizers emphasize that the current phase remains infrastructure testing, with no official commercial launch timeline yet announced—though the next stage will involve real-fund pilot deployments.
Unlike past central bank initiatives that only published research reports, these seven major monetary authorities have spent two years developing and field-testing a real-time cross-border clearing system—and its underlying code has already been validated. Today’s remaining challenges are no longer technical, but rather political: how multiple governments coordinate regulation and allocate responsibilities across the shared network. Administrative coordination hurdles remain formidable.
Legacy cross-border messaging giant SWIFT is simultaneously advancing its foundational upgrade—positioned precisely at the commercial bank layer. On March 30, 2026, SWIFT finalized the design for its blockchain-based shared ledger and entered minimum viable product (MVP) development, targeting live transaction capability by year-end. The ledger is built on Hyperledger Besu—an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible framework—with final fund settlement still executed off-chain via traditional real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems.
However, SWIFT and Agorá are not competitors: SWIFT’s ledger focuses on reconciling tokenized deposits among commercial banks, while Agorá handles final large-value clearing using central bank reserves. From inception, the BIS designed both systems for seamless interoperability—signaling that the traditional cross-border clearing infrastructure is being methodically transformed, in two coordinated steps, into a programmable digital network.
A closer look at the participant list reveals striking overlap: Deutsche Bank is a core Agorá member and also co-founded—alongside Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Barclays, and Santander—a nine-bank consortium exploring issuance of 1:1 reserve-backed tokens on public blockchains; UBS and Citigroup are similarly engaged on both fronts; JPMorgan participates in Agorá and operates its proprietary JPM Coin, while recently piloting cross-border clearing on the Ripple Ledger.
Such dual-track investment is highly unusual in finance: institutions typically concentrate technical resources on a single technological pathway. Top-tier teams pursuing two mutually competing architectures simultaneously reflect deep internal divisions among bank leadership. Even giants wielding massive data sets and capital cannot forecast which framework will ultimately prevail. Technical pathways are now clear—but policy direction remains highly uncertain.
Ripple has championed “atomic settlement” as the optimal solution for cross-border payments for a decade—meaning transactions either settle entirely or fail completely. The BIS’s newly deployed Agorá project realizes this exact settlement logic—only substituting central bank reserve tokens for XRP as the settlement medium, thereby directly undermining XRP’s necessity as a cross-border bridging asset.
Yet the Ripple Ledger continues gaining traction in traditional finance. On May 6, JPMorgan’s Kinexys, Mastercard, Ripple, and Ondo Finance completed the first cross-border redemption of tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds on the Ripple Ledger—settling in under five seconds. Ripple’s USD stablecoin RLUSD has surpassed $1.4 billion in market capitalization; in January 2026, total tokenized assets on the Ripple Ledger exceeded $2 billion; Société Générale issued a euro stablecoin on Ripple in February; and in December 2025, Ripple secured a limited-purpose trust charter from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Ripple’s architectural logic has been empirically validated—but the claim that “XRP is indispensable” has not materialized. Still, Ripple’s ongoing integration into institutional clearing ecosystems carries far greater long-term significance than the rhetorical debate over whether Ripple or central bank reserve tokens are superior.
Setting aside marketing rhetoric, transaction fees on Ripple are extremely low—and permanently waived, with no portion accruing to node operators. Rising institutional transaction volume does not generate revenue for validators or token holders—as gas fees do on Ethereum—but instead results in only marginal XRP burn. When institutions like JPMorgan transfer tokenized assets on-chain, they draw from proprietary liquidity pools—not circulating XRP—relying on the network solely for high-speed transfers and cryptographic security.
The core value of this model lies in ecosystem lock-in. Once financial institutions entrust the network to custody fiat and stablecoin assets, the technology becomes embedded in global financial infrastructure—driving deployment of bank-grade node infrastructure and cementing the ledger as a permanent component of the global financial system. In the long run, deep technological integration with global banking matters far more than the price fluctuations of any single token.
All these variables ultimately converge on the stablecoin赛道. Tether maintains daily trading volumes consistently between $40–$50 billion, with the total stablecoin market cap reaching $320 billion. Agorá remains in pilot phase, with commercial deployment distant; yet SpaceX already manages corporate cross-border treasury operations using stablecoins, and Western Union has launched remittance services on the Solana public blockchain—market competition has already moved ahead.
Agorá targets wholesale cross-border clearing for large institutions. If successfully deployed, it could divert enterprise cross-border funding demand currently served by stablecoins. But this segment represents only one slice of stablecoin use cases: Brazil’s Central Bank Resolution No. 561 prohibits domestic financial institutions from using stablecoins for cross-border payments—yet cannot prevent Brazilian citizens from holding dollar-pegged stablecoins for value preservation; Turkish retail investors buy USDT to hedge against lira inflation—such fragmented demand falls entirely outside Agorá’s scope.
In the short term, stablecoins and Agorá are complementary rather than competitive—their application scenarios barely overlap. Agorá is a closed institutional network accessible exclusively to central banks or licensed banks authorized by them; individuals hoarding dollars for hedging, or small-to-midsize payment firms leveraging public blockchains for cross-border remittances, simply cannot access this system. Official closed-loop systems cannot match the inclusive onboarding speed of public blockchains, nor can public-chain stablecoins meet central banks’ requirements for final settlement authority.
The medium-term landscape is more complex. Today, corporate treasury teams choose USDC or USDT for cross-border settlement because traditional correspondent banking is slow and costly. Should Agorá eventually achieve smooth deployment and sufficient liquidity, some corporate funds may shift accordingly. Given equivalent settlement efficiency, corporate treasurers will prioritize sovereign-regulated channels free of third-party counterparty credit risk.
Yet harmonizing governance rules across seven sovereign central banks is itself a world-class challenge—many past cross-border projects have failed precisely here. Meanwhile, enterprises have already integrated USDC systems and established mature risk-control processes; they won’t dismantle existing operations solely based on a theoretically superior new framework.
The market will likely evolve into a stratified structure: Agorá dominates large-value institutional cross-border channels, while public-blockchain stablecoins retain retail and fragmented use cases. Though this appears to divide the market evenly, the sovereign system effectively establishes boundaries for public blockchains—confining decentralized networks to domains where they cannot undermine the foundational role of traditional intermediaries: remittances, retail savings, and small-value payments in emerging markets. These markets are sizable—but not where global financial leverage is concentrated.
This market stratification theory is about to face real-world testing: the EU’s Pontes framework is scheduled to interconnect various distributed ledger technologies with Europe’s core clearing system TARGET in September 2026—just three months away. Once successfully integrated, European institutions’ tokenized payments will gain direct access to central banks, formally initiating head-to-head competition between official systems and open public blockchains.
The ancient Athenian Agorá marketplace faded not due to technical failure—but because people stopped showing up to trade. That, ultimately, is the sole true benchmark for any financial network.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
