If we gathered all the people who have most accurately predicted gold prices throughout history, could we crack the code of future gold prices?
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
If we gathered all the people who have most accurately predicted gold prices throughout history, could we crack the code of future gold prices?
A single gold bar completely demystified so-called financial experts for me.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insightsBy Jiayi
What if I gathered all the most accurate forecasters, authoritative institutions, and renowned analysts in history for a financial asset—say, gold—compared every one of their predictions against actual outcomes, identified “who was most accurate,” and then examined how these “most accurate forecasters” view the future today?
Wouldn’t that unlock the wealth code for this financial asset?
Motivated by this idea, I actually did it—using gold as the case study and digging through over a decade of prediction records.
For this research, we categorized forecasters into three groups: top-tier Wall Street investment banks and industry institutions; high-profile influencers (“Big Vs”) most vocal on gold; and “legendary forecasters” who accurately predicted pivotal turning points.
We examined the data point by point.
All prediction data we uncovered—presented in full
Wall Street professional institutions:
- Each year, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) invites dozens of top analysts to submit annual gold price forecasts. For 2025, the average forecast from 28 analysts was $2,735 per ounce. The most bullish analyst—Keisuke (Bill) Okui of Sumitomo Corporation—predicted $2,925 and won the LBMA’s “Most Accurate Forecast Award” for being closest to reality.
What was gold’s actual average price in 2025? $3,431.
That means even the most bullish—and award-winning—analyst undershot the actual price by 15%. The market consensus underestimated it by a full 20%.
- Goldman Sachs has two landmark moments in gold forecasting history. In April 2013, Goldman issued a report explicitly recommending shorting gold with a target of $1,450. Gold subsequently plunged 26%, cementing Goldman’s reputation.
But recently, Goldman stumbled. In October 2024, Goldman forecast a 2025 gold price of $2,700. Reality? Gold surged relentlessly throughout 2025 and breached $5,600 in early 2026—double the forecast.
- JPMorgan forecast a baseline 2026 gold price of $5,055 at the end of 2025. Gold surpassed that level ahead of schedule.
Gold-focused Big Vs:
- Peter Schiff—the most famous perennial bull in gold circles—has been calling for "$5,000 gold" for over a decade. From 2013 to 2018, gold traded sideways for five or six years, drawing constant ridicule toward Schiff as “a broken clock.” Yet gold did breach $5,000 in early 2026. His latest comment (March 23): calling the recent pullback “illogical” and predicting gold will surge to $11,400 within three years.
- Jim Rickards—a longtime proponent of "$10,000 gold." His core thesis is that BRICS de-dollarization will force a global monetary system reset. The direction is sound—but the timeline keeps slipping, and his target remains unmet.
- Robert Kiyosaki (author of Rich Dad Poor Dad), predicted in mid-March that gold would reach $35,000 following “the largest bubble burst in history.”
“Legendary forecasters” who accurately predicted reversals:
- Nouriel Roubini (“Dr. Doom”), famed for predicting the 2008 financial crisis, delivered two sharp calls on gold: In June 2013, when gold hovered near $1,400, he wrote that “the gold bubble is bursting,” targeting $1,000. Gold hit $1,050 at the end of 2015—spot on. In January 2023, with gold trading around $1,900, he turned bullish, forecasting 10% annual gains over five years, targeting $3,000. Gold later far exceeded that.
- Ben McMillan (Chief Investment Officer, IDX Advisors), emerged prominently amid recent price action. At the start of 2024, with gold near $2,000, he forecast $5,000 within five years—a call widely dismissed as “nearly insane” at the time. Gold reached that level in just 18 months.
- Ray Dalio (Founder, Bridgewater Associates), avoids specific price targets, instead offering qualitative macro-cycle assessments. In January 2026, he dubbed gold “the second most important currency” and recommended allocating 5–15% of portfolios to it.
After reviewing the data, you might think—some of these people are pretty accurate?
Hold on. What’s listed above represents only their “most famous calls.” When I pulled their full track records, the picture changed dramatically.
Wall Street professional institutions: Classic lagging predictors
What defines a lagging predictor? They raise targets only after a bull market is already underway—but never enough to match actual gains. When a bear market arrives, they cut targets, but always too slowly.
The LBMA’s 28 analysts are a textbook example. Their annual forecasts essentially amount to minor extrapolations of trends already in motion. With gold already at $2,700 in 2024, their median 2025 forecast stood at $2,735—almost identical to the prior year’s closing price. The result? A 2025 average price of $3,431—a 20% miss.
Goldman Sachs followed the same pattern. Its late-2024 forecast for 2025 stood at $2,700—while gold later soared past $5,000. JPMorgan’s $5,055 baseline was also breached ahead of schedule.
What these institutions truly do is more accurately described as **“trend confirmation”**—they tell you what’s already happening, but consistently understate its magnitude. If you wait for their signals to act, you’ll always be one step behind.
Gold-sector Big Vs: Even a broken clock is right twice a day
Peter Schiff has been calling for $5,000 gold for over a decade. Jim Rickards has long touted $10,000. Kiyosaki boldly declared $35,000.
Their strategy, in essence, is to call for higher prices every year—calling it “I told you so” when it rises, and “not yet” when it falls.
A more critical flaw: these forecasts lack temporal granularity. They don’t tell you when to enter—or when to exit. If you’d gone all-in on gold in 2011 based on Schiff’s call, you’d have endured five or six years of sideways trading and drawdowns before finally breaking even. Faith offers no stop-loss function when you’re down 40%.
Legendary forecasters: Are they consistently accurate?
This group is the most misleading—because they genuinely nailed pivotal turning points, earning them the “prophet” label. But pulling their full records reveals a less pristine picture.
Roubini correctly called the 2013 downturn and the 2023 reversal—two precise pivot-point calls, indeed impressive.
But do you know what he missed in between? In 2009, when gold first broke above $1,000, Roubini publicly stated it “couldn’t possibly rise another 20–30%.” The result? Gold climbed steadily to $1,900 in 2011—a nearly 90% gain. At year-end 2009, with gold at $1,200, he again labeled it “looking very much like a bubble” and claimed “gold has no intrinsic value.”
He repeatedly called for gold’s demise throughout the entire 2009–2012 bull run—completely missing the boat. That chapter is rarely mentioned; everyone remembers only his sharp 2013 call and his 2023 reversal.
Ben McMillan predicted $5,000 within five years at the start of 2024—and gold got there in just 18 months. His logic centered on structural shifts in central bank gold buying, and he was right. But here’s the catch: this is his only widely documented gold forecast. His sample size is one. Does one correct call prove systematic forecasting ability?
Ray Dalio sounds the most stable—no price targets, only allocation advice. But examine his macro forecasts: In 1981, he confidently predicted a U.S. depression—on newspapers, TV, and congressional testimony—only to be spectacularly wrong. Bridgewater nearly collapsed, forcing him to borrow $4,000 from his father to cover household bills. In 2015, he warned of a “1937-style repeat”—which never materialized. In 2018, he forecast a recession “within two years”—again, wrong. In October 2022, he declared a “perfect storm”—the exact month the U.S. stock market hit bottom.
He predicts a financial crisis roughly every two or three years—and the vast majority never happen. Ironically, his oft-repeated line—“You don’t need to predict the price; just allocate 5–15%”—turns out to be the single most useful piece of advice he’s ever offered.
The 2011 script is replaying in 2026
One particularly intriguing finding surfaced in our report.
Before gold peaked at $1,923 in 2011, market forecasts escalated in dramatic steps: $2,000 at the start of the year, doubled by mid-year, and culminating in Jim Sinclair’s $12,500 and Rob Kirby’s $15,000 calls just weeks before the top.The most extreme forecasts appeared merely weeks before the actual peak.
Then, in September, gold crashed. How did forecasters respond? First declaring it a “healthy correction,” then reluctantly cutting targets by 20–30% months later, and finally postponing timelines indefinitely.
In March 2026, gold plunged 25% from its record high of $5,600 to ~$4,200—the largest weekly drop since 1983. How did most institutions and celebrities react? By holding firm on their sky-high targets—or even calling the crash “the best buying opportunity.”
History doesn’t repeat itself exactly—but the script sure looks familiar.
So, how do they see the future now?
Since we dug deep, here are their latest views—for your reference:
Person/Institution | Latest Forecast | Core Logic
Roubini | Prior $3,000 target achieved; remains bullish | Resurging inflation expectations + long-term structural uptrend
McMillan | $10,000 within five years | Central bank gold buying + U.S. Treasury crisis + BRICS de-dollarization
Dalio | No price target; recommends 5–15% allocation | Structural decline in fiat currency credibility
Jamie Dimon | Could hit $10,000 within this year | Economic concerns + inflation + asset bubbles
Peter Schiff | $11,400 within three years | Calls recent dip “illogical”
Kiyosaki | $35,000 | To follow “the largest bubble burst in history”
JPMorgan | $6,300 | Views dip as profit-taking
Goldman Sachs | $5,400 | Bull market still intact
UBS | $6,200 | Maintains bullish stance
Notice anything? From $5,400 to $35,000, the highest and lowest forecasts differ by nearly 7x. Same market environment. Same data sources. And yet, the world’s top minds deliver wildly divergent answers.
So—did we find the “wealth code”?
My conclusion after completing this entire analysis: No.
Institutions perpetually chase, Big Vs perpetually shout, and legendary forecasters aren’t consistently right—they’re simply right at certain moments, while their errors fade into obscurity. Overlaying all three categories’ forecasts doesn’t yield greater accuracy; instead, it creates greater confusion—since they often contradict each other at the same moment.
I used to believe “find the most accurate forecaster and follow them” was a viable path. After this research, I realized: there is no such thing as a “consistently most accurate person” in gold forecasting. There are only people who happened to get it right this time.
Final thoughts
Gold alone completely demystified so-called financial experts for me.
Whether alpha is attainable depends—not just on models and data—but perhaps, on fate.
So rather than trying to crack the wealth code, I’ve decided to follow Dalio’s lead: avoid specific price predictions, acknowledge uncertainty, and manage risk via strategic allocation.
I bought gold last year—and will continue accumulating this year. My personal investment horizon is a 10-year timeframe.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
@jiayi_en
