Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer
TechFlow Selected TechFlow Selected
Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer
Ethereum didn’t miss the market—it missed itself.
Navigating Web3 tides with focused insightsAuthor: Reid
Translated by Jiahuan, ChainCatcher
When you don’t want to blame the people who turned Ethereum into what it is today, you say, “ETH has earned its market cap.” But that cap isn’t some abstract outcome of coordination theory—it’s the result of specific people making specific decisions on specific dates.
A declaration before any accusations: As an early fundraiser, I’m still building on Ethereum. I respect its vision and liquidity.
At the same time, I’m also a frustrated, long-term ETH holder—and that’s precisely the point: This is an insider speaking candidly, not a Solana shiller throwing rocks from the sidelines.
Retiring Before Taking Office
Somewhere between 2021 and 2023, the Ethereum Foundation’s rhetorical framework shifted.
“We’re building” became “We are infrastructure.”
Vitalik’s focus pivoted from the Casper specification to essays on pluralism, multi-identity, and network states.
David Hoffman’s narrative of “trustworthy neutrality and generous stewardship” is exactly the kind of language mature institutions use to justify ceding ground.
This is posturing like an incumbent before ever securing the seat. In markets, posture shapes outcomes. Acting like a winner before winning is precisely how challengers take your lunch money.
Ethereum declared itself retired before ever claiming the chair—and the price chart reflects it accurately: Since the Merge, ETH has lost roughly 65% against BTC.
The Environmental Pitch Is a Signal
The marketing centerpiece of the Merge was a 99.95% reduction in energy consumption. Go check Ethereum’s official website. That choice reveals whom the Ethereum Foundation is speaking to: their own conscience—not the market. Institutions want yield. Developers want certainty. Users want cheaper transactions.
Promoting ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) instead of user experience signals that Ethereum is answering questions capital allocators never asked.
For years, ESG critics and climate activists attacked PoW over carbon emissions. That attack failed against Bitcoin—not because it lacked merit, but because capital allocators simply didn’t care.
Ethereum spent its most consequential narrative window defending against a toothless critique—rather than selling speed and yield. Meanwhile, Solana sold speed.
Seven Years Late
Proof-of-Stake (PoS) appeared on Ethereum’s roadmap since its 2015 mainnet launch. Vitalik had been discussing the Slasher algorithm as early as early 2014. The Merge wasn’t completed until September 15, 2022—seven years after launch, spanning two full crypto cycles.
Solana launched its mainnet beta in March 2020. While Ethereum consumed its biggest narrative window delivering PoS, Solana delivered wallets, multiple decentralized exchanges, aggregators, money markets, and foundational alternatives to the DeFi tech stack.
The cost wasn’t just calendar time—it was ETH’s dominant window into the 2021 bull run. By the time PoS shipped, the modular vs. monolithic debate was already mainstream—and Ethereum had already lost its pole position.
No Native Staking UX
PoS lies at the heart of the “ETH-as-money” thesis: issuance discipline, native yield, sound money.
Three years after the Merge, the Ethereum Foundation still hasn’t released a first-party staking app suitable for ordinary users. The official path? Run command-line tools on an air-gapped machine, stake at least 32 ETH, and operate and maintain your own validator node.
Users must route through Lido—and Lido’s share remains stuck around 25%. Vitalik himself has pointed out this centralization risk.
Every asset aspiring to be money has a default custodial and yield pathway. Bitcoin has Bitcoin Core. The dollar has banks. Yet ETH—the most critical monetary property of ETH—lacks a standardized interface.
When an organization doesn’t want to compete, it says, “We don’t pick winners.” This is the constructive failure hiding beneath all the others.
A Managed Decline
The rollup-centric roadmap explicitly weakens the base layer. EIP-4844 went live on March 13, 2024. Blob base fees have hovered at or near 1 wei for most of 2024 and 2025. Ethereum’s quarterly fee revenue has fallen ~95% from its Q4 2021 peak of $4.3 billion.
Arbitrum’s own marketing blog states: “Arbitrum L2 captures 90–98% of operating margins.” As of mid-2025, Base accounts for ~70% of all rollup profits. Every major L2 has issued its own token—severely fragmenting capital flows within the Ethereum ecosystem.
This can’t be justified by architecture. From a revenue standpoint, it’s strategic surrender. The timing of the base layer’s hollowing coincides precisely with Solana proving that integrated L1s can capture fees and accrue value to their native tokens. Modularity sounds elegant in slides.
Ideology Over Product Delivery
This is an uncomfortable topic. The Ethereum Foundation’s vocabulary is philosophical: trustworthy neutrality, public goods, quadratic funding, pluralism, regen, multi-identity. Ethereum culture prizes philosophical correctness over product victory.
Vitalik writes essays attempting to distance the chain from financialization—while the market’s only willingness to pay is precisely for financialization.
Call it “wokeness,” call it “academic capture”—the label doesn’t matter. The essence is identical. Every successful consumer tech company optimizes for what users actually want—not philosophical purity.
The iPhone is closed. AWS is centralized. Uber broke laws. Stripe ignored standards. They shipped what users didn’t yet know they wanted—and built moats.
Solana organizes around one question: What do users want—and how do we deliver it together? Its ecosystem coordinates tightly; products compose seamlessly; value flows back to the base asset.
Ethereum organizes around philosophical purity.
One side ships. The other debates philosophy.
When you stop competing, you rename yourself “a noble steward.”
A Real Diagnosis
Dressing up current decline as a “dignified fig leaf” is self-deception. The real root cause is accumulated execution debt.
What’s holding things back isn’t coordination failure—it’s delivery failure. Ethereum held absolute structural advantage in 2021, yet spent its best three years debating governance—while Solana coordinated efficiently as an ecosystem and priced the next L1 cycle without Ethereum’s involvement.
“ETH has earned its market cap” is true. That earned cap is simply lower than bulls expected—and lower than I expected. Its cause is concrete execution failures—not coordination theory.
Selling because “the logic has already priced in” is a dignified exit. The honest truth is: We’re selling because Ethereum has abandoned the fight to grow asset value.
Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned
Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily
X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost
X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News
@reidlikeabook
